Skip to main content

Big Ten Update - "Eh..." about sums it up

I'm beginning to think that the Big Ten and ACC have swapped places this year. In recent years, it's often times felt as though the Big Ten has been pretty top heavy, while the ACC has had some fairly decent teams throughout the conference, but none able to be a serious title game contender. To this point in the season, it's felt like while the ACC is rather top heavy with the likes of Florida State and Clemson, the Big Ten is mediocre to above average throughout much of the conference.

On the positive side for the conference this past Saturday, Penn State was able to come away with their first victory of the season in pounding Navy and Northwestern moved to 3-0 with a 22-13 win over Boston College.

Then there's the down side. The front-runner of the conference - Michigan State - was handled fairly easily by Notre Dame on Saturday night. Ohio State - the new front-runner (who isn't eligible for a bowl game due to a team infraction) - had trouble putting away a Cal team which had lost to Nevada and needed some scores in the 4th quarter to defeat I-AA Southern Utah. Wisconsin was a missed field goal away from falling to Utah State, beating the Aggies 16-14. Then unbeaten Indiana lost to Ball State. In the end, we're down to just three unbeatens in the conference: Ohio State (not bowl eligible), Northwestern and Minnesota. These three teams went a combined 15-23 last year. Granted - I think Ohio State is improved from a season ago and Northwestern has always been pesky under head coach Pat Fitzgerald, but Minnesota was 3-9 a year ago. No, things are not looking good for the Big Ten so far this season. To this point in the year, I believe there's a fine line which divides the top three major conferences from the bottom three. At the top (in random order) are the SEC, Big XII and Pac-12 and at the bottom (in random order) are the Big East, ACC and Big Ten.

This next weekend: The Buckeyes will host UAB, Wisconsin will host Mike Price's UTEP Miners, Iowa will host the Chippewas of Central Michigan, Michigan State will host Eastern Michigan, Nebraska will host I-AA Idaho State, Northwestern will host I-AA South Dakota, Penn State will host Temple, Illinois will host Louisiana Tech, Minnesota will host Syracuse and Michigan will travel to South Bend to take on the Fighting Irish of Notre Dame. Of the ten teams from the Big Ten playing this next weekend, nine will be playing their non-conference games at home. The teams the Big Ten will be playing out-of-conference this weekend include two from Division I-AA. Excluding Notre Dame, the other seven opponents have a combined record of 5-12. Outside of Michigan possibly losing to Notre Dame, any other loss by the conference this coming weekend will prove to be yet another devastating blow for it this season.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"