Skip to main content

Philadelphia Eagles 24 Baltimore Ravens 23

For the second time in two weeks, the Philadelphia Eagles turned the ball over at least four times (five last week) and for the second time in two weeks, they won by a single point.

The Philadelphia Eagles have turned the ball over nine times in their first two games (six interceptions and three fumbles) and yet have found a way to hang around in both games before quarterback Michael Vick has led them to a go-ahead touchdown in the final minutes.

Looking at the turnover situation, I honestly have no idea how the Eagles are 2-0, yet looking at all the other statistics, I have no idea how they wouldn't be either.

On Sunday against the always solid Ravens defense the Eagles converted 26 first downs, were 7 for 15 on 3rd down (46.7%), gained 486 total yards (129 on the ground and 357 through the air) and held onto the ball for 34:21. While the team only averaged 3.1 yards per carry, the Eagles averaged 11.2 yards per pass attempt and 6.5 yards per play. On the season, the Eagles are ranked 1st in the NFL in yards per game at 471.0. The next closest team is the New York Giants - a full 34.5 yards per game behind Philadelphia. Philly is 2nd (behind the Giants) in passing yards per game with 331.5 and are 8th in rushing yards per game with 139.5. In points per game, however, the Eagles are tied for 26th in the league, scoring just 20.5 per game.

Sadly enough having turned the ball over four times, the Eagles' offense looked much more crisp than they did the previous week against Cleveland. The offensive line protected Vick better in the passing game. He still got hit more than head coach Andy Reid would like, but it was still an improvement. Vick himself looked better throwing the ball than he did against the Browns. His first interception was a bonehead decision, but the second shouldn't have happened, as it appeared like the intended receiver had his hands on the ball and should have made the catch - not to mention that the defender had his right arm wrapped around him which likely would have resulted in a pass interference call if the non-replacement officials were calling the game. The defense was pretty solid throughout, especially in the second half. The secondary, in particular, played well, as they made Baltimore Ravens' quarterback, Joe Flacco's life a living nightmare in the final thirty minutes.

Up next for the Eagles are the 2-0 Arizona Cardinals on the road this next Sunday afternoon. If the Eagles learn to be careful with the football, they should improve to 3-0 in time for their big NFC East showdown with the New York Giants the following Sunday night.

Between better protecting Michael Vick, Vick and the offense better protecting the ball and perhaps the defense better stopping the run, the Eagles have a lot to work on this week in the run up to the game with Arizona, but for as sloppy as the offense has played to this point, they have to be quite ecstatic they're heading into said game with a 2-0 record.

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=320916021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"