Skip to main content

Paul Ryan insinuates President Obama is extremist on the issue of abortion - how ironic...

During a speech in for the Values Voter Summit in Washington on Friday, Republican Vice Presidential candidate - Paul Ryan - uttered the following words: "'We're all in this together' - it has a nice ring. For everyone who loves this country, it is not only true but obvious. Yet how hollow it sounds coming from a politician who has never once lifted a hand to defend the most helpless and innocent of all human beings, the child waiting to be born."

He continued by saying, "President Obama has chosen to pander to the most extreme elements of his party..."

Mitt Romney's running mate was attempting to play off the president's words from his speech at the Democratic National Convention, where he said that "We're all in this together." What I find laughable is Ryan of all people trying to paint Obama as the extremist when it comes to the issue of abortion.

Ryan himself believes abortion should be illegal even in the cases of rape or incest. Pinocchio Ryan also co-sponsored a bill with Missouri Republican Senate candidate, Todd Akin, which would have redefined the word "rape." Yes- it's THAT Todd Akin. Remember him? The guy who recently declared that women have magical vaginas and if raped, these magical powers supersede sperm, science and chance?

This is getting funny. Just earlier, it was reported in an interview with George Stephanopoulos, Mitt Romney said he'd have to prepare for President Obama to lie during the debates as he's known to do according to Willard Mittens Romney. Paul Ryan is now painting the president as an extremist on abortion. While we're at it, why doesn't Mitt accuse President Obama of being rich and due to that, not being able to relate to the middle-class?

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/paul-ryan-obama-cant-say-were-in-this-together-because-hes-pro-choice.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more