Skip to main content

Big Ten Update

There were five Big Ten match-ups this past weekend - two of which were solid football games and the other three I and many others wish had never been played.

Illinois and Purdue continued to prove that they're the two worst teams in the conference, with the Illini getting trampled by unbeaten Ohio State, 52-22, and Purdue falling to 3-6 after losing to 6-3 Penn State, 34-9. Michigan beat up on 5-4 Minnesota by the final score of 35-13 to improve their record to 6-3.

In the two solid football games, one presented two teams which may not become bowl eligible by season's end, as Indiana came back to defeat Iowa by the final of 24-21 to send both teams to 4-5 on the season. In the best and biggest game of the weekend, 20th ranked Nebraska went to East Lansing and beat the now 5-5 Michigan State Spartans, 28-24, on a last-minute scoring drive to improve the Huskers to 7-2. Northwestern and Wisconsin had the week off.

For the time being, four teams are bowl eligible (Nebraska, Michigan, Northwestern and Wisconsin) and three teams are bowl ineligible (Ohio State, Penn State and Illinois). Next week will present some interesting match-ups. Wisconsin comes off their bye week to play pesky Indiana on the road. If the Hoosiers upset the Badgers, that would place the two teams in a tie atop the Leaders division (excluding bowl ineligible Ohio State and Penn State), with Indiana having the head-to-head tie-breaker advantage. Indiana's only 4-5. If they win next week, we'll have a 5-5 team which will be positioned to control its own destiny en route to the Big Ten Championship game. Yes, the Big Ten is that bad this year. Northwestern comes off their bye week to face Michigan in Ann Arbor. We'll see if Michigan's starting quarterback, Denard Robinson, will be able to play in that game. Purdue and Iowa will square off in Iowa City to battle for their bowl eligible lives. With a loss, Purdue would become bowl ineligible and if Iowa loses, they'd fall to 4-6, with Nebraska still left on the schedule - making it very unlikely they'd go bowling at season's end. Speaking of Nebraska, they'll play host to Penn State, who will try to play the role of spoiler in upsetting the Huskers and potentially ending their run at a possible Big Ten Championship game berth. Lastly, 5-4 Minnesota, with Nebraska and Michigan State left on the schedule, may need to beat the struggling Illini on the road if they want to participate in a bowl game.

Besides the Big Ten being extremely mediocre this year (and that's being kind), the only other thing that's for certain is that at season's end, either Nebraska or Michigan will represent the Legends division in the conference title game and either Wisconsin or Indiana will represent the Leaders division. Only one of these four teams is ranked in the BCS top 25 - Nebraska at #16. Yeah, like I said - the Big Ten really is that bad this year.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/standings

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"