Skip to main content

Just how awful was Gallup polling this election?

I was often very critical of Gallup polling during the run-up to the election. Their polls appeared to be major outliers and while many in conservative circles loves the numbers, it seemed highly unlikely that Gallup was right and everyone else was wrong. With their drastically different numbers, Gallup was either going to be the genius of pollsters, with all others falling short of their accuracy, or the biggest joke in the polling community. Upon seeing the actual election numbers, it became quite obvious that Gallup was the latter. Just how awful was Gallup? Let me provide a few numbers.

Most of the pollsters were conservatively biased to some extent this election cycle. Out of 23 pollsters that provided at least one likely-voter poll in the final three weeks of the campaigns, only 4 were biased in favor of Obama - 19 out of 23 were biased in favor of Romney.

Rasmussen Reports is notorious for their conservative-bias in their polls. The same was true throughout this election season, as on average, Rasmussen provided a 3.7 point Republican bias on average in their polls. It was even worse for the American Research Group - another group that is rather notorious for their conservative bias. ARG, on average, had a 4.5 point bias for Romney. These numbers pale in comparison to Gallup. Gallup, on average, had a conservative-bias of 7.2 points - almost seven and a half points! That's absurd! From this point forward, whenever Gallup says their margin of error is +/-4.5, I'll know that to mean +/-12. It's official - Gallup has become a bigger joke than Rush Limbaugh's love life.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/#more-37396

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"