Skip to main content

Just how awful was Gallup polling this election?

I was often very critical of Gallup polling during the run-up to the election. Their polls appeared to be major outliers and while many in conservative circles loves the numbers, it seemed highly unlikely that Gallup was right and everyone else was wrong. With their drastically different numbers, Gallup was either going to be the genius of pollsters, with all others falling short of their accuracy, or the biggest joke in the polling community. Upon seeing the actual election numbers, it became quite obvious that Gallup was the latter. Just how awful was Gallup? Let me provide a few numbers.

Most of the pollsters were conservatively biased to some extent this election cycle. Out of 23 pollsters that provided at least one likely-voter poll in the final three weeks of the campaigns, only 4 were biased in favor of Obama - 19 out of 23 were biased in favor of Romney.

Rasmussen Reports is notorious for their conservative-bias in their polls. The same was true throughout this election season, as on average, Rasmussen provided a 3.7 point Republican bias on average in their polls. It was even worse for the American Research Group - another group that is rather notorious for their conservative bias. ARG, on average, had a 4.5 point bias for Romney. These numbers pale in comparison to Gallup. Gallup, on average, had a conservative-bias of 7.2 points - almost seven and a half points! That's absurd! From this point forward, whenever Gallup says their margin of error is +/-4.5, I'll know that to mean +/-12. It's official - Gallup has become a bigger joke than Rush Limbaugh's love life.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/#more-37396

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...