Skip to main content

Johnny Manziel - should a freshman be allowed to win the Heisman?

The short answer? Yes. The long answer? Hell yes! Okay, so that's not the long answer. However, that may be the only thing keeping Texas A&M quarterback Johnny Manziel from being a shoo-in for the Heisman Trophy this year. You see, Manziel is a freshman and no freshman has ever won the Heisman Trophy before. There are some voters whom won't vote for a freshman because it's against their religion or something along those lines.

In all honesty, I don't know what voters' reason(s) would be to not believe a freshman is worthy of the coveted award. Do they feel freshmen are undeserving, because if one has a great season, it's more due to beginner's luck than actual skill? Do they feel it's morally wrong to vote for a guy in his first year than another that has been with his team for between two and four years? Was an 11th Commandment added, which says, "Thou shalt not vote for a freshman for the Heisman Trophy"? Whatever the reason, hasn't the Heisman Trophy been about rewarded the best player on a great team? In essence, a hybrid of the best player and MVP?

Johnny Manziel has led the Texas A&M to a 10-2 season, with the Aggies currently ranked 9th in the BCS poll. He led the Aggies to the only win of the season to this point against defending national champion Alabama. That isn't even touching on what Manziel has done individually. The freshman phenom has completed 273 of 400 pass attempts (68.3%) for 3,419 yards (8.5 per attempt), 24 touchdowns, and 8 interceptions, for a quarterback rating of 155.9. He's also run the ball 184 times for 1,181 yards (6.4 per carry), for 19 additional touchdowns. The guy has been responsible for 4,600 yards from scrimmage this year and 43 touchdowns. He's in the top 20 in passing and the top 30 in rushing. With his performance in his team's dominating 59-29 win over the Missouri Tigers, Manziel set the SEC record for total offense in a season. Who owned the record previously? Cam Newton of 2010 National Champion Auburn Tigers, who amassed 4,327 yards that year, en route to winning the Heisman Trophy.

Keep in mind that Cam Newton won the Heisman Trophy and deservedly so for his 2010 campaign. Newton completed 185 of 280 pass attempts (66.1%) for 2,854 yards (10.2 per attempt), 30 touchdowns, and 7 interceptions, for a quarterback rating of 182.0. He also ran the ball 264 times for 1,473 yards (5.6 per carry) and 20 more touchdowns.

This is comparing 14 games for Cam Newton to 12 for Johnny Manziel. Since A&M will not be playing in the SEC title game, he'll wind up playing one fewer game this year than Newton did in 2010. As of right now, Manziel has accounted for 272 more yards this year than Newton did a couple years ago. Manziel's on pace to throw for about 3,704 yards; 26 touchdowns; run for another 1,279 yards; and 21 more touchdowns, for a total of 4,983 yards and 47 touchdowns - 656 more yards than Newton accounted for in 2010, but three fewer touchdowns. Again, though - it would be with one less game played for the freshman quarterback. If he played fourteen like Newton did, he'd be on pace for the following numbers: 3,989 yards passing; 28 touchdown passes; 1,378 yards rushing; and 22 touchdowns - totaling 5,367 yards from scrimmage and 50 touchdowns. With those numbers, he'd be at +1,040 yards compared to Newton and exactly even with the former Auburn Heisman winner when it comes to touchdowns. In other words, Johnny Manziel's numbers are superior to those put up by the 2010 Heisman Trophy winner. I don't care if the guy is a true freshman or 5th year senior, he deserves to win the Heisman Trophy!

http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/collegeQuarterbackRating/year/2012/group/80

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/cam-newton-1.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"