Skip to main content

New Orleans Saints 28 Philadelphia Eagles 13

I don't have a whole lot of time to write tonight. Let's just say that the Monday night game against the New Orleans Saints was just the continuation of a sad trend for the Philadelphia Eagles, as they fell to the Saints 28-13 to drop to 3-5 on the season. Philly totaled 447 yards on offense - 226 through the air and 221 on the ground, yet they only managed to come away with 13 points. In five red zone opportunities, they did not score a single touchdown - turning the ball over twice (one Vick interception and one Brent Celek fumble) and kicked two field goals. Along with those two key turnovers, Philly committed 7 penalties for 58 yards. Quarterback Michael Vick was sacked 7 times and hit many others.

As I've been saying the past couple weeks, the Eagles' lines are killing the team. Philly now has four back-ups playing on the offensive line and as a result, Vick isn't getting any protection. Before tonight, minimal running lanes were being opened for LeSean McCoy and company. On the other side of the ball, Saints' quarterback Drew Brees had all day to throw for most of the game. He was sacked twice and turned the ball over once via a fumble, yet the pressure exerted by the Eagles' front seven was pretty minimal.

But, for as crazy as it may sound, the Eagles still aren't out of the playoff picture. Three of their next four games are against NFC East opponents, with their first coming at home against Dallas this coming Sunday. Looking at the Eagles' remaining schedule, every game appears to be winnable, yet every game also appears to be losable. Philly will have to start winning and winning quickly if they want to have any chance at going to the post-season. With the way they've been playing this past month, I can't say I like their chances.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more