Skip to main content

Big Ten Update

There were six conference games this weekend to close out the regular season. With Nebraska's 13-7 victory over Iowa on Friday afternoon, the Huskers clinched the Legends division and will face Wisconsin in the Big Ten title game next week. The Badgers fell to Penn State today by the final score of 24-21 in overtime, which dropped them to 4-4 in conference and 7-5 overall. Both Purdue and Michigan State became bowl eligible with wins today - the Boilermakers defeated Indiana 56-35 to improve to 3-5 in conference and 6-6 overall and Michigan State beat Minnesota on the road 26-10 to also improve to 3-5 in Big Ten play and 6-6 overall. Northwestern pounded Illinois 50-14 to send the Illini home for the holidays winless in conference play. Lastly, Ohio State finished their season unbeaten by defeating rival Michigan by the score of 26-21.

Due to both Ohio State and Penn State being ineligible to play in bowl games due to their NCAA violations, the Big Ten has just seven bowl eligible teams, three of which are 6-6 (Purdue, Michigan State, and Minnesota), one is 7-5 (Wisconsin), one is 8-4 (Michigan), one is 9-3 (Northwestern), and one is 10-2 (Nebraska).

The Big Ten is looking a lot like the ACC as far as seasons go and conference championships. Due to Ohio State, Penn State, North Carolina, and Miami (Florida) being ineligible for post-season play, the two conferences have only 13 bowl eligible teams combined.

The conference title games will be as follows:

Big Ten - Nebraska (10-2) vs. Wisconsin (7-5)

ACC - Florida State (10-2) vs. Georgia Tech (6-6)

That's right - these two conference title games include a team with at least five losses. If either Wisconsin or Georgia Tech upsets Nebraska or Florida State in their conference title games, the Big Ten and/or ACC will be represented in a BCS bowl game by an unranked team with a record of 8-5 or 7-6. Ouch... When all is said and done, the ACC is only guaranteed to have five teams with above-.500 records (Florida State, Clemson, North Carolina State, North Carolina, and Miami (Florida) and the Big Ten is only guaranteed to have six such teams (Nebraska, Michigan, Northwestern, Ohio State, Penn State, and Wisconsin). I suppose it could be worse for the Big Ten and ACC(barely) - they could be the Big East...

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/scoreboard?confId=5&seasonYear=2012&seasonType=2&weekNumber=13

http://espn.go.com/college-football/standings

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"