Skip to main content

Ben Stein: "Michael Brown was armed with big and scary arms and stuff..."

To say that conservative pundit Ben Stein has seriously lost it is not really open for debate. To say he ever had "it" in the first place is quite debatable. Just last week, Stein appeared on Newsmax to discuss the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri, where he made the following statements:

- "He wasn't unarmed. He was armed with his incredibly strong, scary self."

- "It's a very sad state of affairs. I mean it used to be, there was a time ... when lynchings of African-Americans were not that incredibly rare. Now the lynchings are the police and it's just an outrage."

- "...it's the very large, so-called victim attacking the policeman who winds up dead." (with regard to Brown and Trayvon Martin)

- "I mean if they didn't just, would not attack the policeman, if they would just talk to the policeman in a reasonable way instead of attacking the policeman, nobody would be dead."

First off, George Zimmerman wasn't a police officer. As a matter of fact, he went against the police's orders to not follow Trayvon Martin.

"...it's the very large, so-called victim attacking the policeman who winds up dead."

Translations:

"It's the large, so-called unarmed victim that gets followed by an armed wannabe neighborhood watchman who goes against the policeman's wishes on following him who winds up dead."

and

"It's the large, so-called unarmed victim that appears to have tried to surrender to the policeman who winds up dead."

Secondly, if George Zimmerman didn't go against the police's wishes and follow Trayvon Martin, nobody would be dead. If Darren Wilson didn't get trigger-happy, nobody would be dead. When Cliven Bundy threatened the government, many like Stein called him an American hero. If he had talked to them in a reasonable manner, he'd likely be referred to as a coward by these same individuals. If that had been Michael Brown or Trayvon Martin, their opinions would likely have been reversed. Unfortunately, there are too many occurrences in this country when an African-American (male, most likely) tries being reasonable with law enforcement and he gets shot and killed as a result, because the police viewed him as threatening.

That last line gets at the very heart of what's really wrong with Ben Stein's statement of, "He wasn't unarmed. He was armed with his incredibly strong, scary self."

If Officer Darren Wilson truly felt his life was in danger, he could have just shot Michael Brown in the legs, before handcuffing him, and taking him in to the police station for questioning. No matter how "intimidated" Wilson may have felt, that gave him no excuse to shoot an unarmed man as many times as he did, especially twice in the head. Sadly, the following two scenarios probably aren't very extreme exaggerations of what Stein and his ilk believe are proper reactions by law enforcement.

Scenario #1: An armed white man yelling at people while on a median in a downtown area

Charles Mansion: :: waves his gun around ::

Mothers and their children: :: run away ::

Officer Michael White: "What do you think we should do?"

Officer Darren Worthless: "Let's see what else he does before making a move."

Charles: :: continues waving his gun around :: "See this? This is a gun! I could use it to shoot and kill any one of you, but it wouldn't be the gun shooting and killing you with a bullet; it would be me. That's because guns don't kill people; people kill people!"

Businessmen: :: run away ::

Officer White: "This guy is causing too much of a disturbance, don't you think? We should probably calm this situation down some."

Officer Worthless: "Are you kidding me? This man is a hero! He's standing up for our Second Amendment rights!"

Officer White: "That's right! Thank you, sir! Great job!"

Officer Worthless: "F'ing A right!"

Both officers: :: fire their guns in the air :: "Yee-haw!"


Scenario #2: An unarmed black man walking on the sidewalk of a downtown area

Officer Michael White: "Whoa! Big black dude - 12 'o'clock. Keep your eyes on him."

Officer Darren Worthless: "Will do. He looks like trouble."

Benjamin Teddy: :: reaches down ::

Officer White: "He's reaching! Get ready to fire!"

Officer Worthless: "I think that's a gun! Fire! Fire! Fire!"

:: the officers shoot and kill Benjamin Teddy ::

Officer White: "Oh, crap! He was just going to pick up a piece of paper he dropped!"

Officer Worthless: "It looked like a gun, right? I felt threatened. Did you feel threatened?"

Officer White: "You know I felt threatened. Think we'll be safe in court?"

Officer Worthless: "Don't sweat it. It was a big black dude. They'll believe us."

Both officers: :: laugh and walk away ::

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ben-stein-michael-brown-unarmed

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"