Skip to main content

Radio show host Scott Ferrall (and others) makes bone-headed comments about Ray Rice's wife

On my way home last night, I was both curious to hear what talk radio had to say about the extended version of the Ray Rice tape and also about the Monday night football games. I stumbled across this show called On the Bench, hosted by Scott Ferrall, who went on at length about the Ray Rice tape and about the situation in general.

While Ferrall heavily bashed Rice, he also criticized his wife, Janay Rice, quite a bit as well. At one point during an interview, he went on this seemingly never-ending tangent, where he repeatedly called Janay a liar, as well as stupid, saying, "What woman in her right mind would want to marry and stay with a man like that? I'll never understand that. She's obviously stupid. I don't get it. I mean, I know some women who hold grudges over the smallest of things for 20 years, yet this woman gets punched in the face and stays with the guy? Acts like it's no big deal? No other woman would do something like that. What is wrong with her?" (paraphrasing...)

Sadly, Mr. Ferrall isn't the only one who feels this way. While many people appear to initially feel sorry for the abused, there's a definite limit to this sympathy, and if the victim stays with the "abuser," that sympathy all but vanishes.

A 2008 report conducted by the National Resource Center on domestic violence illustrated just this, as it said:

"The view that leaving is the answer to domestic violence is so strong that it has become the standard by which victims are judged. Leave and you are worthy of the full range of services and protection. Stay and the resources may be limited."

While, on the surface, it may be incredibly difficult for most people to fully understand why a woman would stay with a man whom abused her, the situations are often times far more complicated than they appear and we'd be much better off blaming the abusers for their actions and attempting to get them the treatment they need to improve in that area of their lives, as opposed to blaming the victims.

Chai Jindasurat, programs coordinator for the Anti-Violence project, agrees, as he recently told ThinkProgress the following:

"When we solely focus on whether a survivor stays with or leaves their abusive partner, we place all the responsibility on the survivor rather than holding an abusive partner accountable. Intimate partner violence is about power and control, and leaving can be an extremely dangerous and frightening situation."

Sadly, there are many reasons why a person may stay with an abusive partner:

1) Children

2) Financial dependence

3) Fear of endangering themselves further by leaving

4) Feeling they deserve the poor treatment (a cycle of abuse through past relationships)

5) Love/Wanting to feel the person can change

The fact of the matter is the only two people whom know all of the details regarding their situation are Ray and Janay Rice. While outsiders can speculate all they'd like, Janay Rice has decided to stand by her husband. I only hope her husband Ray receives the help he needs for the betterment of his own health and well-being, as well as his wife's and the rest of his family's. I sincerely hope this was a one-time occurrence and Janay Rice is never subjected to that kind of violence again. In any case, from this point forward, I hope that whenever a person stands by their abusive partner, Scott Ferrall and the like don't ask, "How stupid does a person have to be to stick with an abuser?" and instead ask, as the National Network to End Domestic Violence noted on their site, "Why does the abuser choose to abuse?"

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/09/09/3564896/janay-rice-cycle-abuse/

http://www.ferrallonthebench.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"