Skip to main content

Texas tells kindergartner it's unmanly to have long hair...well, basically...

Last week, Principal Sherrie Warren of F.J. Elementary School in Seminole, Texas, sent 5-year-old Malachi Wilson home because since he was a boy, he wasn't allowed to attend school with long hair. Malachi Wilson's parents are Navajo and Kiowa, and due to their religious beliefs, feel that their son's hair is sacred and shouldn't be cut. While Principal Warren backed down and allowed Malachi Wilson to go back to school on the second day, it's still quite troubling he was sent home for even just one day. Not only was the move against both the 1st and 14th Amendments in the Constitution, it was also wrong on a basic tolerance and decency level. Must all boys and girls fit in with historic societal norms of how they should both appear and act, and if one steps out of line, he or she must be sent home as a result? If that's the case, expect Principal Warren to illegally send kids home for the following reasons in the future:

- "I feel it's my ethical duty to send this little girl home because her hair is just as short as Halle Berry's, and that's not ladylike!"

- "She has to be sent home because she was playing one of those sports games with the boys during recess and real girls don't partake in such filthy activities!"

- "This little boy is going home because he was reading a book during recess! Only girls are allowed to do that! What is wrong with him?"

- "Did she really think she could get away with wearing jeans and a t-shirt? Does she think she's a boy or something? Have your mother pick you up! You're going home and aren't coming back until you wear something more feminine!"

- "I'm sorry, Billy, but you shouldn't have helped that little boy up after he fell. You should have left him there, let him grow up to be a real man by helping himself up. Call your parents. You're going to have to go home."

- "I, Principal Sherrie Warren, will be sending myself home today, because apparently I need to update myself on how things have changed since the 1950s and try to adapt accordingly. Since I have 60+ years to catch up on, this should probably take me just a day or two. Thank God for Cliff Notes!"

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/09/02/3477766/texas-school-wont-let-native-american-attend-his-first-day-of-kindergarten-because-of-his-long-hair/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...