Skip to main content

Enough with the double-standards regarding sexual assault!

Over the past several weeks and months, I can't tell you how many times I've read or heard stories which focused on female victims of sexual assault needing to take more responsibility to prevent these crimes from taking place, and frankly, I'm sick of it.

Why, so often, do people place the full weight of responsibility on the shoulders of sexual assault victims, as opposed to the actual perpetrators of the sexual assaults?

Almost every time I hear people talking about such situations, they mention one or more of the following:

- "She shouldn't have been wearing something so revealing. She was kind of asking for it."

- "She should have known better than to have drank so much at that party. That was pretty stupid."

- "She should have come prepared, brought some Mace, a gun, or something."

- "She should have brought some friends along that she fully trusted."

- "She shouldn't have flirted with/been so nice to the guy. What was he supposed to think?"

- "She shouldn't have gone to the bathroom by herself. Everyone knows that."

The list seems to be never-ending...

According to these victim-blamers, women must: Dress like they starred on the show Little House on the Prairie, not drink any alcohol, bring bodyguards who follow them around like stalkers, carry a loaded firearm, and act like mimes when interacting with men. If they slip up in any one of these areas (or others) and get sexually assaulted, then apparently it's their fault. Why doesn't any of the responsibility fall on men's shoulders in these situations? Do men get excused from such disgusting and criminal behavior because it's somehow a scientific fact that men are "big, stupid, simple creatures that don't know right from wrong and can't handle any kind of responsibility"?

"She should have known better than to have drank at that party. That was pretty stupid."

How about this? If a man knows he gets violent and stupid when he consumes alcohol, he shouldn't drink, and whether or not a man drinks, that gives him absolutely no reason to sexually assault a woman - regardless of what she wears, who she's with, how much she's drank, or how she interacts with him. No matter what the location or occasion, a man can never be excused for sexually assaulting a woman. Period.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"