Skip to main content

New study shows Benghazi may get a restraining order against Fox News

Liberal watchdog group Media Matters just released a report this morning which showcased just how obsessed and one-sided Fox News was with regard to their reporting on Benghazi. The study was conducted from the night of the attacks on September 11th of 2012 through early May of this year. Here are how some of the numbers break down during those 20 months:

- 1,098 evening segments were aired on the attacks (The Five, Special Report with Bret Baier, On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, The O'Reilly Factor, and Hannity)

- Special Report led the way with 382 such segments

- 244 segments were aired suggesting that "the Obama administration did not initially refer to the attacks in Benghazi as 'terror' or a 'terrorist act'"

- 174 segments were aired in the month leading up to the 2012 presidential election

- 478 segments "invoked the administration talking points used by former ambassador to the United Nations and current National Security Adviser Susan Rice during her Sept. 16, 2012, appearances on the Sunday morning shows"

- 281 segments alleged an Obama administration cover-up

- There were over 100 references to past scandals like Iran-Contra and Watergate

- On 105 occasions, the network tried linking Benghazi to Hillary Clinton's potential political aspirations

- Lastly, Congressional Republicans were asked about Benghazi 144 times while Congressional Democrats and Obama administration officials were only asked about the matter on 5 occasions

So, on five Fox News evening shows, there was an average of 54.9 segments regarding Benghazi in an average month over the course of 20 months, where the ratio of Republicans to Democrats asked about the attacks was at 28.8 : 1. Yes, Fox News is as fair and balanced as Styrofoam rulers are circular and dangerous...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/16/fox-news-benghazi-media-matters-study_n_5824878.html
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i...
Post a Comment
Read more