Skip to main content

Feeling rather indifferent about the coming Facebook "dislike" button...

I suppose I won't truly know how I feel until I see it first-hand, but upon first hearing about the coming "dislike" button on Facebook, I'm not finding myself to be nearly as enthusiastic about it as some seem to be, yet I don't completely hate the idea either.

On one hand, I admit it does feel incredibly odd to "like" certain posts due how negative in tone and/or content they are, and it'd feel much more appropriate to click a "dislike" button instead. On the other hand, it would get a tad old seeing so many "dislikes" regarding a post or story which meant a great deal to me personally.

So, while I can understand the rationale for a "dislike" button on Facebook, I just hope it's used more for the purpose Mark Zuckerberg intended - that being a show of empathy, rather than as a means for a troll army to make their opinions known regarding a political issue. Without a "dislike" button, most such individuals would ignore the post and go on about their days. However, with a "dislike" button, the temptation to click it may be too difficult for many of them to resist.

Side-note: Word broke today about a Facebook dislike button scam. You can read more about it here - http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/facebook-dislike-button-scams-spread-phishing-attacks-malware-across-social-network-1520513

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...