Skip to main content

Ted Cruz will not be getting the Colbert-bump...

For as big of a fan of Stephen Colbert's comedy as I am, even I'll admit his new show had a few hiccups during its first week. However, the show seems to get better on each successive night, not only on the comedic front, but also the interview front. That trend certainly held true last night, especially when Colbert interviewed Texas Republican Senator and one of 492 GOP candidates running for president, Ted Cruz.

One thing I've always enjoyed about Colbert's shows is how, unlike many cable news networks (sadly enough), he doesn't let his guests get away with BS. While CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC may have a tendency to not fact-check their guests on the spot (unless, in Fox News' and MSNBC's case, their opinion drastically differs from that of their guest), Stephen Colbert does, and it's quite refreshing.

Last night, when Ted Cruz decided to misuse Ronald Reagan's name, like 99.9% of Republicans do nowadays, Colbert actually called him out on it, saying this:

"Let me ask about Reagan for a second. Reagan raised taxes, okay. Reagan actually had an amnesty program for illegal immigrants. Neither of those things would allow Reagan to be nominated today. So to what level can you truly emulate Ronald Reagan?"

After Cruz admitted he does not agree with Reagan on his tax increases and amnesty program, he said, "But Ronald Reagan also signed the largest tax cut in history. He reduced government regulations from Washington and economic growth exploded."

Colbert responded with this:

"He did. But when conditions changed in the country, he reversed his world's largest tax cut and raised taxes when revenues did not match the expectations, so it's a matter of compromising."

When The Late Show host discussed gay marriage with the Texas senator, the two got into the following back-and-forth:

Ted Cruz: "Well actually, let's be precise. Under the Constitution marriage is a question for the states."

Stephen Colbert: "It doesn't mention marriage in the Constitution."

Cruz: "The 10th Amendment states that if the Constitution doesn't mention it, it's a question for the states ... I don't think we should entrust governing our society to five unelected lawyers in Washington," adding, "If you want to win an issue, go to the ballot box and win at the ballot box. That's the way the Constitution was designed."

So, kudos to Stephen Colbert and his writers for fully preparing for the Texas senator and not letting him get away with BS responses.

Ted Cruz: "I'm much like Ronald Reagan..."

Stephen Colbert: "Yeah, what about his tax increases and amnesty program?"


Ted Cruz: "We shouldn't allow five unelected judges to determine this country's fate; that should be left up to the states."

So, like with the Affordable Care Act and same-sex marriage rulings, Cruz had a similar fit about the Supreme Court ruling in favor of George W. Bush and Citizens United? I don't think so... Also, since Cruz feels gay marriage should be left to the states with the people voting on the matter, is he in favor of such a vote for heterosexual marriage too? Again, I'm not thinking so...


Ted Cruz: "The people want jobs, not more of what's going on right now, and to get this country back on track."

From 2000-2009, under Republican President George W. Bush, 1.3 million jobs were created. From 2009-2015, under Democrat President Barack Obama, over 8 million jobs have been created, even after inheriting the Great Recession from Bush. So, over these past 6.5 years, hasn't this country slowly gotten back on track, Mr. Cruz?

It's refreshing to finally have a nationally televised late night talk show host go after politicians with hard-hitting questions, fact-check their responses, and not simply lob them a bunch of softballs. It'll be both interesting and entertaining to see Colbert's interviews with political candidates over the next year, starting tonight, as he will talk to the one, the only, Donald Trump.

http://www.salon.com/2015/09/22/stephen_colbert_dismantles_ted_cruzs_anti_gay_bigotry_tax_cut_fanaticism/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"