Skip to main content

If Kim Davis and the far-right got their way...

Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis has made a lot of headlines in recent weeks due to her not issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples because it went against her religious beliefs. Many far-right conservatives, including multiple Republican candidates running for the 2016 presidential election, have come to Ms. Davis' defense, saying it's her First Amendment right to believe as she so chooses and that she should be exempt from having to fully follow through with her job responsibilities due to religious freedom. Like I've noted many times before, Kim Davis is allowed to believe in whatever religion she so chooses. However, if those religious beliefs prevent her from fully doing her job, she should seek work elsewhere. There's a reason why the Civil Rights Act was passed and why the LGBT community has long been fighting for similar protections under the law. Regardless of a person's age, gender, race, creed, or orientation, he or she should be treated equally as a customer. Kim Davis has every right to be a Christian. However, under the law, she has no right strip another of their equality due to her beliefs. Just imagine if this mentality and these actions became the norm for all religious groups in this country...

Setting: At a Walmart in Podunk, Michigan

Customer Bradley Johnson: "Hi, how are you doing today?"

Cashier Jessica Goldstein: "Pretty good, and yourself?"

Bradley: "Good, good. Just getting ready for a big family get-together."

Jessica: "That should be fun. Wait, is this shellfish?"

Bradley: "Yes"

Jessica: "I'm sorry, but that's against my religion. Would you mind going to aisle 2? Thanks."

Bradley: "Uh, yeah, sure..."

Cashier Sanjay Patel: "How are you doing this afternoon, sir?"

Bradley: "Okay, and you?"

Sanjay: "Not too shabby. Wait, is this beef?"

Bradley: "Yes..."

Sanjay: "I'm sorry, sir, but this is against my religion. Would you mind going to the cashier in aisle 3? Thanks."

Bradley: "Okay..."

Joe Smith: "How are you doing this fine day?"

Bradley: "I'm not sure anymore."

Joe: "Why's that? Been getting passed around by the cashiers because something you want to purchase goes against their religious beliefs?"

Bradley: "Yeah..."

Joe: "Well, don't worry about it anymore. I'm sure your purchases will be fine with me."

Bradley: "Great; I really need to get home and start cooking."

Joe: "Oh oh..."

Bradley: What now?"

Joe: "Is this coffee?"

Bradley: "Yes..."

Joe: "I'm sorry, sir, but this is against my religion. Would you mind going to the cashier in aisle 4?"

Bradley: "Jesus... Okay, fine..."

Mahmoud Ali: "Hello sir, how are you doing this evening?"

Bradley: "I'm starting to get a headache."

Mahmoud: "I'm sorry to hear that. Wait, is this alcohol?"

Bradley: "It's O'Doul's..."

Mahmoud: "So, yes? I'm sorry, but this is against my religion. Would you mind going to the cashier in aisle 5?"

Bradley: "It's non-alcoholic beer."

Mahmoud: "There's still a little alcohol in it and it's beer."

Bradley: "There's about as much alcohol in here as in Root Beer. Would you not sell me that either?"

Mahmoud: "I'm not..."

Bradley: "Oh, forget it; I'll just order a bunch of food for tonight. I no longer have time to cook anyway."

Mahmoud: "Okay, have a pleasant day."

Bradley: "Bite me! Wait, not yet; let me cover myself in bacon first!"


Yes, if she used her mentality consistently across all religious groups, this would be the perfect world according to Kim Davis and her ilk. But while everyone has religious freedom in this country, one can't use their religious beliefs to strip others of their freedoms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"