Skip to main content

Liberal media outlets need to calm down with regard to Trevor Noah

While I often times criticize conservative media outlets for appearing to have amnesia with regard to facts and the more nonpartisan media outlets for fearing to be perceived as biased by simply telling the truth void of the opposite (and inaccurate) viewpoint, I also find myself coming after liberal media outlets for their tendency to sometimes overreact.

Last week, I wrote a blog with regard to some liberal media outlets overreacting to Stephen Colbert's interview with Donald Trump on The Late Show. No, Colbert's questions weren't quite as hard-hitting as they had been with Ted Cruz the previous night, but they weren't softballs either. In fact, the slowest softball Colbert threw at Trump was a question pertaining to whether or not the GOP front-runner thought President Obama was born in this country, to which Trump refused to respond. Also, let's keep in mind how difficult it would be for an interviewer to bait Donald Trump into saying something most rational-thinking people would deem ridiculous when Mr. Trump himself utters such things on his own. So, yes, some in the liberal media definitely overreacted here.

Speaking of which, Trevor Noah made his debut as host of The Daily Show last night, and what headline did I read courtesy of the left-leaning site Salon.com this morning with regard to the new host? Just this: "Trevor Noah gives Fox News a free pass: The new 'Daily Show' could be great for Ailes and Hannity, bad for America." I know, subtle, right?

Yes, most self-identified liberals and progressives, myself included, loved Jon Stewart as host of The Daily Show, but it's only fair to give the new guy a chance. Let's remember, the transition from Craig Kilborn to Jon Stewart wasn't the smoothest of transitions at first either, so Trevor Noah, like Jon Stewart before him, at least deserves a chance to show what he can do as the show's host once all the kinks are worked out through the transition.

Yes, Trevor Noah did appear to be nervous and overwhelmed at first last night. No, the interview with comedian Kevin Hart wasn't one I care to remember. However, the program still had that old Daily Show feel to it, long-time contributors will help make the transition a bit smoother for the new host, and so long as Noah can relax a bit more in due time, I have the feeling it should continue to make for a great show. But no matter what flaws we saw with the show or new host last night, let's not overreact. It's one show. Let's see how it progresses two weeks and two months from now before making a more well-informed judgment.

http://www.salon.com/2015/09/28/trevor_noah_gives_fox_news_a_free_pass_the_ne

w_daily_show_could_be_great_for_ailes_and_hannity_bad_for_america/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"