Skip to main content

I have officially popped my “Glee” cherry…

That's right. As of February 6th of 2011, I can say I am no longer a virgin in the world of Glee.

I'm not sure what to say. I've heard a lot about it. It is an Emmy Award-winning show. A male friend of mine has been raving about it to me, as has my mother and I just heard about it from another friend. So, after watching the Super Bowl, I decided to sit down and give it a gander.

After watching the episode and admitting it on Facebook (sort of...), I have decided I need to find a quiet place, evaluate myself and where my life is going and ultimately decide if I'm still attracted to women. Okay, so I kid, I think...

The question I have for myself now is, will I continue to watch it? Like last night and how many players on the football team didn't want to be affiliated with the Glee Club due to image, I'm running into that same predicament myself. I do have one male friend (of which I'm aware) whom watches the show, so perhaps he and I can have one another's back and perhaps start a club with the title of, "Straight Male Glee Fans" or something along those lines, or perhaps, "Jane Lynch Is Hot". Hmmm... Being the fact she's a lesbian, I'm not sure that would work. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but creating and joining a group by that name probably wouldn't persuade others that we males in the group are in fact heterosexual. I'll have to go over this idea with my buddy, brainstorm ideas and see what we come up with.

In the meantime, I'll be continuing to hum the song "Thriller". If no one is looking, I may even give the moonwalk and crotch grab a try. Eh, forget that. I'd feel much more secure knowing that someone is around, being the fact I'm likely to trip over my feet or some inanimate object and potentially hurt myself in the process, requiring a trip to the E.R. So, I think I'll just type about the hypothetical situation and leave it at that, along with the crotch grab, of course.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more