Skip to main content

A Kaiser poll shows that three years later, America still doesn't know what Obamacare is all about

It's been about three years since President Obama's healthcare law passed Congress and was signed by the president himself. Sadly, three years later, the public is just about as uninformed now on the healthcare law as it was right when it passed.

A Kaiser poll was just released regarding the public's knowledge on the healthcare reform law, and the numbers were quite disturbing.

When poll participants were asked if the healthcare law included the following components, more answered the questions incorrectly than correctly:

- "Cut benefits for people in Medicare" - 43% correctly answered that the law does not do this and 44% incorrectly answered that it does do this, with 14% responding that they aren't sure.

- "Establish a government panel to make decisions about end-of-life care for people on Medicare" - 39% correctly answered that the law does not do this and 40% incorrectly answered that it does do this, with 21% responding that they aren't sure.

- "Allow undocumented immigrants to receive subsidies to purchase insurance" - 33% correctly answered that the law does not do this and 47% incorrectly answered that it does do this, with 21% responding that they aren't sure.

- "Public option" - 28% correctly answered that the law does not do this and 57% incorrectly answered that it does do this, with 15% responding that they aren't sure.

So, on average, just 35.75% of the public answered these four questions correctly, while 47.0% answered them incorrectly, and another 17.75% weren't sure.

Awareness of some key elements of the law has decreased from April of 2010 to March of 2013 as well, such as the following:

- "Tax credits to small businesses to buy insurance" - From 66% (4/10) to 52% (3/13)

- "Subsidy assistance to individuals" - From 75% (4/10) to 62% (3/13)

- "Guaranteed issue" - From 64% (4/10) to 53% (3/13)

- "Medicaid expansion" - From 64% (4/10) to 59% (3/13)

- "Health insurance exchanges" - 62% (4/10) to 58% (3/13)

On these five components of the healthcare law, the public's awareness of them decreased from an average of  66.2% to 56.8% - a whopping 9.4% between April of 2010 and March of 2013.

Lastly, the poll showed quite the disparity between the public's awareness of certain elements of the healthcare law and its approval of these very elements, such as the following:

- "Tax credits to small businesses to buy insurance" - While 88% approve of this, only 52% are aware it's part of the healthcare law

- "Close Medicare 'doughnut hole'" - 81% approve/46% are aware

- "Create health insurance exchanges" - 80% approve/58% are aware

- "Extension of dependent coverage" - 76% approve/62% are aware

- "Subsidy assistance to individuals" - 76% approve/69% are aware

- "Medicaid expansion" - 71% approve/59% are aware

- "Guaranteed issue" - 66% approve/53% are aware

- "Medical loss ratio" - 65% approve/40% are aware

- "Increase Medicare payroll tax" - 60% approve/54% are aware

 On average, 73.67% of the public approves of these nine elements of the healthcare law, while only 54.78% of it is aware that they are actually components of the healthcare law.

It's sad to say, but it appears as if right-wing politicians' and media outlets' continuous exaggerations and outright lies regarding the healthcare law has significantly impacted the public's view of it. Hopefully the public becomes better informed of it before its complete implementation on January 1st of 2014, and hopefully the Democratic Party becomes more adamant in countering these falsehoods with the facts, because outside of the individual mandate, which is largely unpopular at this point, every other key component has at least a 57% approval rating. If the public actually gets informed about the law, chances are that with an increase in awareness of the law, an increase in approval of it will be showcased as well.

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/03/21/1753731/obamacare-misperceptions-poll/

http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8425-F.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"