Skip to main content

"Normal" is the answer, eh? What was the question again?

I recently read an article entitled "Why 'Normal' Is Such A Catch," and it befuddled, yet humored me, so I thought I'd share the experience with readers.

Regardless of whether or not I'm dating someone at the time, I find it painfully humorous (yes, there is such a thing) to read articles surrounding dating/love advice. Why? Because they're typically more cliche-ridden than a film released on Valentine's Day by the name of Hallmark Card, and while I typically loathe cliches, I also often times find them to be unintentionally humorous due to how ridiculous they come across, especially if taken from a literal rather than a figurative angle.

The author of the before-mentioned article is a "dating coach" and authored a book by the title of Stop Looking for a Husband: Find the Love of Your Life. ...and the award for most horoscope-sounding book title of the year goes to...

So, back to the article, where Marina Sbrochi writes the following:

"...The question is, what do you want?

It's funny, because when you ask people what they are looking for in a mate, you most often hear adjectives like 'smart', 'good looking', 'great job', 'must have chemistry', 'similar interests' -- you know, the basics. However, I was having this discussion with a recently divorced girlfriend who had been out on tons of dates, but felt that none were even remotely impressive enough to warrant a fourth date.

The other day I got a phone call. I could feel the excitement on the line. Julie told me that she had met someone she really liked -- finally! I was super excited for her, so we made plans to meet for lunch to talk about the guy.

'So, tell me about him?'

The first word that came out of her mouth was 'normal.' 'He's pretty normal,' she said calmly and confidently."

Sbrochi later writes:

"It's a compliment beyond all compliments. There are tons of hot people out there; they're a dime a dozen, especially if you live in Los Angeles. There are tons of talented people out there. Tons of smart people too. But normal -- not tons. In fact, Julie told me that out of the last six guys she has dated that this was the only normal dude..."

Not long after, the author writes the following:

"Normal! Seriously folks. Bells and sirens are going off in the background. Ladies and gentleman, she has won the prize -- a normal guy!"

Sbrochi finally closes with this:

"You should revise your perfect mate wish list now. Be sure to add normal to the top of the list.

What does 'normal mean to you?"

The biggest problem I have with this article is that it appears the author is attempting to suggest that "normal" is objective, yet then goes on to contradict that with her final line, which appears to acknowledge it's subjective.

I think it's virtually impossible to universally define the word "normal," especially with regard to individuals' personalities, interests, and the kind of relationships they're pursuing. The last thing I'd ever do is define a woman I'm dating as "normal," because while she may seem "normal" to me due to our common interests and the like, she may be anything but "normal" to another, and the same goes for everyone. No two people are exactly alike, so how can we accurately describe one as "normal" and another as not? My current girlfriend is big into: Video games, cars, sports (somewhat), rock music, action movies, etc. Is this "normal" for a woman her age? My own personal survey says... I don't care. Is it "normal" for a guy my age to enjoy: Poetry, foreign and independent films, oldies, etc.? Again, I don't really care. I don't care how "normal" a woman is, if she and I don't share a grand chemistry, connection, and attraction with/toward one another, then I'm sorry, but it's not going to work.

When finishing Ms. Sbrochi's article, I had to chuckle, as I immediately thought of a scene from the award-winning film As Good As It Gets, starring Jack Nicholson, Helen Hunt, Greg Kinnear, and Cuba Gooding, Jr.

Toward the very end of the film, Helen Hunt belts out the line, "Why can't I just have a normal boyfriend?"

Her mother promptly responds with, "It doesn't exist."

Exactly...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marina-sbrochi/why-normal-is-such-a-catc_b_2903899.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"