Skip to main content

Who's the most accurate? A psychic, a tarot card reader, or a weatherperson?

I know I've said this before, but I think weatherpeople are the luckiest people in the world. They make, on average, over $90,000 a year to be wrong 99% of the time.

My birthday was this past Thursday and the present I received from my girlfriend were two tickets to the Muse concert tomorrow night in Columbus. I had checked out the forecast all week and the weatherpeople were calling for a high between 36 and 38 degrees with a chance of flurries on the night of the concert. This was their prediction through yesterday. When I checked this morning, they drastically altered their forecasts to read as follows: Winter storm watch, with 4-8'' of snow from Tuesday afternoon through Wednesday afternoon, and sleet mixed in for good measure. There's already talk about the concert being canceled or postponed due to the altered forecast.

What do these people get paid for anyway? Within 12-24 hours, they go from, "It'll be an average late winter day, without much to worry about as far as extreme cold temperatures or precipitation is concerned" to "You may not want to go out of the house for the next 24 hours due to extreme weather conditions. Even if you have to shovel, you may want to duct tape a pillow to the back of your pants due to a high probability of you slipping on ice and falling on your backside. You're welcome."

These predictions are wrong on some level 99% of the time. What weatherpeople essentially get paid for is telling us what is happening right now. What I would give to get paid close to $100,000 for going on television and telling people the following - "Well, as everyone could see, it was a sunny day today. It was cool, but without much wind, the temperature was tolerable. It is darker and colder tonight than it was earlier today. Last I checked, the skies were clear, so expect it to feel much colder overnight. It'll be brighter again tomorrow morning. Okay, that's all I've got for now. Back to you, Chuck and Sandra..."

Why not pay a child in candy to do something similar every night? The child could say, "I was able to go out and play today without a coat! It was fun! We played freeze tag! I won! Woo-hoo! Where's my sucker?"

The child could then pull out a series of random numbers from a hat to provide him/her with his/her forecast. My guess is the level of accuracy wouldn't be drastically different from the meteorologists of today. Let's just give them all a crystal ball, a deck of Tarot cards, and call it a day...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"