Skip to main content

Romney is as smooth as butter...wrapped in barbed wire and filled with rocks

Mitt Romney is back in the news. I know, I missed him too. Mr. 47% himself had the following back and forth with Fox News' Chris Wallace on Sunday:

Romney: "We did very well with the majority population, but not with the minority populations, and that was a failing, that was a real mistake."

Wallace: "Why do you think that was?"

Romney: "Well, I think the Obamacare attractiveness and feature was something we underestimated, particularly among lower incomes. And, uh, just didn't do as good a job in connecting with that audience as we should have."

This man has to be one of the most awkward public speakers in recent memory. The man's words probably makes robots give themselves a facepalm. When he proposed to his wife Ann, I imagine the Mittster did so by saying something like the following:

"Ann, we've been spending a lot of time together over the past however long it's been, and been fornicating quite regularly. When we're together, my heart does something it doesn't normally do and that's beat. So, would you continue to make it beat by getting dressed up in front of family and friends at a church and when asked if you do, say you do, and be with and committed to me for all eternity?"

Mr. Smooth is Mr. Cognizant as well. The guy said, "...And, uh, just didn't do as good a job in connecting with that audience (lower-income individuals) as we should have."

Is he surprised by this? After all, in the run-up to the election, Mr. Smooth said the following:

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what. And I mean, the president starts off with 48, 49, 48 - he starts off with a huge number. These are people who pay no income tax. Forty-seven percent of Americans pay no income tax. So our message of low taxes doesn't connect. And he'll be out there talking about tax cuts for the rich. I mean that's what they sell every four years. And my job is not to worry about those people - I'll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What I have to do is convince the 5 to 10 percent in the center that are independents that are thoughtful, that look at voting one way or the other depending upon in some cases emotion, whether they like the guy or not, what it looks like..."

Then four months after the election, Mr. Obvious says this:

"...And, uh, just didn't do as good a job in connecting with that audience (lower-income individuals) as we should have."

If Romney runs for president yet again (for the twelfth time it seems), he should start his campaign by releasing a book entitled, "The 47% - The Low-Income Schmucks I Want To Connect With So They'll Vote For Me." That should definitely give the man an early edge in the election year...

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/03/03/1663671/romney-i-lost-because-minorities-love-obamacare/

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/full-transcript-mitt-romney-secret-video

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"