Skip to main content

Pondering about sin

The concept of sin fascinates me. It's perhaps partially due to the fact religion fascinates me. While I am in no way religious, I still find it to be a fascinating concept, and enjoy reading and pondering about it.

Is sin subjective? Is there one set of sins according to religion and the after-life and another set according to living humans and the present life, or are they one and the same?

Whenever I hear the word "sin," I immediately think of the Ten Commandments, which go as follows:

1. "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"

2. "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image"

3. "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain"

4. "Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy"

5. "Honour thy father and thy mother"

6. "Thou shalt not kill"

7. "Thou shalt not commit adultery"

8. "Thou shalt not steal"

9. "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour"

10. "Thou shalt not covet"

Like with the English language, are there exceptions to these rules or are they absolute? Is it sinful for the state to execute a convicted murderer or is that an exception to the Commandment "Thou shalt not kill"? What about in matters of self-defense?

Are there "sins" of significant importance which aren't mentioned in this list of Commandments? Many like to claim that homosexuality is sinful. If it was truly of significant importance, why was it not mentioned in this list? Eating meat has been described as being sinful in The Bible. Does that make all of us meat-eaters truly sinful? Can the status and perception of sins be altered through time? Is the status of sin dependent on circumstance? What about swear words? Words that at one point in time weren't seen as vulgar, but are today?

I guess one thing I'm having trouble understanding is if God is omniscient and omnipotent, how could something be viewed as a sin during his/her/its time but not today? On the other hand, times change, so how can we treat everything said or done during man's inception similarly to today? Yes, these are the kinds of things I think about when I'm ill, tired, and don't have much else to do. While some may sit on the couch and watch soap operas or game shows, I'm sitting here pondering about the concept of sin when I'm not even religious. Yes, I'm an odd one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"