Skip to main content

Robert Morris' upset of Kentucky is being overblown

In the 1st-round of the NIT, last year's national champion - Kentucky - fell to Robert Morris by the final score of 59-57 last night, and it's being hailed by some talking heads in the media as one of the biggest upsets in the history of college basketball. I'm sorry, but that's absurd.

For those that don't know about the NIT, many jokingly say it stands for the Not Invited Tournament. The NCAA Tournament selects the 68 best teams to play in a single-elimination tournament. There are four play-in-type games to condense the field to 64 teams when the tournament really gets underway. The next "best" batch of 32 teams play in a similar-style single-elimination tournament by the name of the NIT. So, teams ranked between 69 and 100 play in the NIT. These are teams whom showcased they were better-than-average, but not good enough to get invited to the NCAA Tournament.

Given that, Kentucky's loss to Robert Morris last night, while sure, it was an upset, was not near an upset of such grand magnitude that some are calling it. Again, this game was played in the NIT (Not Invited Tournament), between teams ranked somewhere between 69 and 100. If this were a game played in the NCAA Tournament, when Kentucky was a 1-, 2-, or 3-seed, and Robert Morris was a 14-, 15-, or 16-seed, then we could start talking about it being one of the biggest upsets in the history of college basketball. However, that's not the case. Also, let's not forget that Kentucky had lost three out of their previous four games going into last night and five of their previous nine. This is not a great basketball team. They lost to 18-15 Texas A&M by 12 points at home earlier this year, NIT-bound Tennessee by 30 on the road, 15-17 Georgia by 10 on the road, and 16-17 Vanderbilt by 16 at home, among others. Just because Kentucky has the big name doesn't mean their falling to a small school in the first-round of the NIT is anything very newsworthy. Five years from now, in a greatest-upsets-in-college-basketball-history countdown, I can bet almost anything that there won't be an NIT game listed in the countdown; and that includes Kentucky's loss last night to Robert Morris.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...