Skip to main content

Study shows that cable "news" is lacking on the news front

As I've been saying for a long time, cable news is about as reliable as a few older drunk guys at a bar discussing politics. It's based much more on opinion than fact, and even when facts are shared, they are often times overshadowed by controversial, headline-grabbing opinions.

A new Pew Research study confirms my long-held suspicions. Of the three major cable news networks, CNN is the best when it comes to factual reporting, as 54% of the network's coverage is factual, whereas 46% of it is simply opinion. Fox News flips those numbers around, as just 45% of it is based on factual reporting (thanks Shepard Smith and Chris Wallace) and 55% of it is opinionated commentary. MSNBC's programming is showcased to only be 15% factual, while 85% of it is opinion. This means that on the three major cable news networks, it's coverage on average is comprised of 62% opinion and 38% fact.

This is a growing problem in this country, I feel, for over 3 out of every 5 stories (bits) reported on the three major cable news networks revolve around opinion and not fact, and a progressively increasing number of people are blurring the lines between the two.

Even though I admit to being liberal and my beliefs being more closely aligned to those regularly expressed on MSNBC than those on CNN or especially Fox News, I still feel it's wrong for MSNBC to spout opinions 85% of the time and continually try blur the lines between fact and opinion for viewers and listeners alike. It's becoming a growing problem for people's "facts" being dependent on partisan cable news channels. When Republicans can go to Fox News for their "facts" and these run in stark contrast to the "facts" expressed on MSNBC, where Democrats go, this often times leads to very frustrating conversations and debates between people of different political persuasions.

People wonder why I'm so good at debating politics and why I've never lost a political debate. It's because I've learned how to differentiate fact from opinion, don't mistake opinion as fact, and use fact to back up my opinion. When a person comes at me with an opinion they mistake for fact, I'm able to dismiss that opinion via fact-checking, and am further able to back my opinion with fact, the debate winds up being as fair as a grizzly bear getting into a fight with a hamster named Squeaky.

http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/special-reports-landing-page/the-changing-tv-news-landscape/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more