Skip to main content

The definition of ignorance - Scott Terry at CPAC

Judging by what I read, CPAC should no longer stand for Conservative Political Action Committee. It should stand for Crazy People Are Coming. This could be seen as a double-entendre, for it could be referring to the people speaking at this gathering or how these people see everyone else.

Last Friday, audience member Scott Terry - a 30-year old from North Carolina - had a few interesting bits of commentary to share with the other audience members, as well as speakers.

After presenter K. Carl Smith of the Frederick Douglass Republicans referenced a letter written by Douglass, where he forgave his former master, Terry blurted out, "For what? For feeding him and housing him?" Sadly, this comment was met with applause and cheers.

Following this back-and-forth, Terry was heard saying, "Why can't we just have segregation?"

Terry wasn't done there. He also said that whites have been "systematically disenfranchised" by the federal government.

When asked if he'd be okay with a society where African-Americans were permanently slaves to their white masters, Terry replied with, "I'd be fine with that."

I wish I was finished, but I'd be leaving out yet another lovely comment by the young man. When a woman challenged him on the roots of the Republican Party, he responded with, "I didn't know the legacy of the Republican Party included women correcting men in public."

...and here the Republican Party wonders why they've struggled earning the votes of women, and especially of minorities...

Whether Scott Terry likes it or not, this country is diverse and becoming progressively more diverse by the year, where in a few years, whites will no longer be the majority. He can deny it all he'd like, and hope that his racist beliefs and commentary will somehow motivate more people of his pasty skin tone to take control of this country by enslaving minorities again. However, the quantity of Caucasians whom don't regularly go around sporting white hoods far outnumbers those, like Mr. Terry, who do. So, don't get your hopes up, Mr. Terry - just do us all a favor and keep your trap shut.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/03/15/1729331/cpac-slavery-minority-outreach/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...