Skip to main content

Was Joe Flacco worth it? Probably not...

Super Bowl-winning quarterback for the Baltimore Ravens - Joe Flacco - was rewarded for his spectacular playoff efforts by becoming the highest paid player in NFL history (for now) when he was offered (and accepted) a six-year deal worth $120.6 million.

What has resulted since the Flacco signing for the Ravens? In addition to future Hall-of-Fame linebacker Ray Lewis and center Matt Birk retiring, Baltimore: traded veteran wide receiver Anquan Boldin to San Francisco, released safety Bernard Pollard and guard Bobbie Williams, and lost linebackers Dannell Ellerbe (Miami), Paul Krueger (Cleveland) and cornerback Cary Williams (Philadelphia) to free agency. Veteran free safety Ed Reed will likely land elsewhere as well. To this point, the Ravens have lost two starters on offense (and a back-up) and four on defense (as well as a back-up) - five if Reed takes his services elsewhere. To this point, Baltimore has also yet to sign their: 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-string tight ends (Ed Dickson, Dennis Pitta, and Billy Bajema), their 1st- and 2nd-string free safeties (the before-mentioned Ed Reed and Sean Considine), 2nd-string defensive end (Arthur Jones), 2nd-string nose-tackle (Ma'ake Kemoeatu), and 1st-string left tackle (Bryant McKinnie). So, Baltimore is guaranteed to have just 7 of 11 offensive starters and 6 of 11 defensive starters (13 of 22 total) from their 2012-2013 Super Bowl-winning team on their 2013-2014 roster.

While Flacco put up video-game worthy numbers in the playoffs and is a pretty solid NFL quarterback, still with plenty of upside, he's likely not going to be worth sacrificing so many quality NFL players. In the 2012-2013 season, Flacco ranked: 15th in completions (317), 14th in attempts (531), 19th in completion percentage (59.7), 14th in passing yards (3,817), 16th in yards per game (239), 14th in yards per attempt (7.19), tied for 15th in touchdown passes (22), 8th in sacks allowed (8th most with 35), and 12th in quarterback rating (87.7). Based on those numbers, Flacco had a better-than-average regular season this past year. This is how his five-year NFL career has played out to this point - better-than-average in the regular season and great in the postseason if the Ravens made the playoffs. In his five years as the Ravens starter, Flacco has put up the following numbers: completed 1,507 of 2,489 passes (60.5%) for 17,633 yards (7.08 average), 102 touchdowns, 56 interceptions, and a quarterback rating of 86.3 (average season: 301.4 of 497.8 for 3,526.6 yards, 20.4 touchdowns, and 11.2 interceptions). Flacco's averages would give him the following ranks if applied to the 2012-2013 season: 18th in completions, 19th in attempts, 17th in completion percentage, 18th in passing yards, 16th in yards per completion, and 19th in touchdown passes. Those rankings are very average.

Joe Flacco went on a great run this past postseason en route to a Super Bowl victory over the San Francisco 49ers. He's also young enough where it's quite possible he's yet to reach his peak. However, throughout his five years as a starter, his numbers have been between average and above-average, and even with his great performance in this past postseason, he's likely not going to be worth his current price tag in the long-run, especially at the cost of losing so many quality NFL players. The Ravens may have won the Super Bowl this past year, but are going to be hard-pressed to even win their division this next season, let alone the Super Bowl.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9052336/the-joe-flacco-contract-fallout

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9066834/john-harbaugh-baltimore-ravens-roster-change-part-nfl

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/_/name/bal/baltimore-ravens

http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/_/name/bal/baltimore-ravens

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating/year/2012/seasontype/2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"