Skip to main content

West Virginia newspaper (Lincoln Journal) prints a racist's comments

A West Virginia newspaper - the Lincoln Journal - just recently published the following comments from a reader in response to the Lincoln County Board of Education firing lesbian teacher Kelli Burns due to her accusation that board officials forced students to write complaints about her trying to "turn them gay":

"We were really glad to hear that School Board is getting rid of them queers. The next thing is we need to get rid of all the n****rs, the spics, the kikes and the wops. You know even them Catholics, they are wrong as baby eaters. We need to clear them people out and have good, white, God fearing Christians and everybody else needs to be put to death for their abominations. We'll keep Lincoln County white and right. Thank you."

First off, it's quite ignorant to blame a minority of a population for a majority of problems within that population in any context, but that's especially the case here. If Lincoln County is anything, it's white. In its 2011 census, whites made up 99.0% of the population.

Secondly, if this Lincoln Journal reader is a firm believer in The Bible and taking all its scriptures literally, chances are he'd be guilty of an abomination and as he so eloquently worded it, "needs to be put to death" for it.

If I were to speak to this reader, I'd have to ask the following questions:

- "Have you ever lied?"

- "Have you ever been arrogant?"

- "Have you ever eaten beef?"

- "Have you ever eaten pork?"

- "If you answered yes to any of the previous four questions, do you feel you should be put to death for your 'abomination'? If you answer yes to that question, tell me, on a scale from 1 to 49, what would you say your IQ is?"

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/21/west-virginia-papers-anti-lgbt-column-wants-death-for-nggers-spics-kikes-and-wops/#.UUtDtlfYHws.facebook

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/54/54043.html

http://www.dragonlordsnet.com/abomination.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...