Skip to main content

Is the American public really this stupid?

In a fairly recent Quinnipiac poll, the following results were shown:

- 92% of people support mandatory background checks for guns, even with regard to private or online sales

- 56% support a total ban of assault weapons

- 56% support a ban on the sale of high-capacity magazines

- 46% believe the NRA (National Rifle Association) better reflects their views on guns, whereas 43% believe President Obama better reflects their views of guns

So, let me get this straight...

Both the public and President Obama support background checks, banning assault weapons, and banning the sale of high-capacity magazines. The NRA doesn't fully support any of these measures. YET, the NRA is more reflective of the country's views on guns than President Obama? How does that work exactly?

This reminds me of a make-believe conversation I got into with an imaginary person named Winnie near election time this past November:

Me: "So, who do you side with on the tax issue?"

Winnie: "Obama, most definitely!"

Me: "What about with regard to job creation?"

Winnie: "Obama!"

Me: "Which candidate do you feel better reflects your beliefs on abortion and gay-marriage rights?"

Winnie: "Obama all the way!"

Me: "How about gun control?"

Winnie: "Obama yet again!"

Me: "So, who do you think you'll be voting for?"

Winnie: "Romney, without question..."

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail/?ReleaseID=1847

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more