Skip to main content

Facebook paranoid/uninformed post

On Facebook this morning, I saw one of my long-time conservative Nebraska friends posted a sign which read, "You call me paranoid. I call you uninformed." It said this in relation to the 2nd Amendment.

I have a feeling this person (and many others) may be uninformed about paranoia. Let's look at the definitions, shall we?

Paranoia is defined as the following:

1. "a form of schizophrenia characterized by a slowly progressive deterioration of the personality, involving delusions and often hallucinations"

2.  "a mental disorder characterized by any of several types of delusions, in which the personality otherwise remains relatively intact"

3. "intense fear or suspicion, especially when unfounded"

As for the word "uninformed," it's defined as "not informed; lacking in knowledge or information."

So, what this person (and others) is (are) saying is essentially this - "You may think I possess an intense fear or suspicion, especially when unfounded. I, on the other hand, think you're simply not informed; lacking in knowledge or information."

Remember, this is with regard to 2nd Amendment rights and the belief that President Obama and his administration are out to strip us of those rights - sending cops to kick down our doors and take our guns away.

So, the people who believe this don't have an "intense fear or suspicion, especially when unfounded"? Those of us who think this are "not informed; lacking in knowledge or information"?

The gun control group known as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence gave President Obama an "F" grade on every issue, including: Background checks, gun trafficking, guns in public, the federal assault weapons ban, standing up to the gun lobby, and leadership. While the president has, in light of the Newtown tragedy, attempted to improve those grades, he hasn't received much help from Congress to this point.

I'm thinking this Facebook post should, instead of saying, "You call me paranoid. I call you uninformed.," read, "You call me paranoid. It's because I'm uninformed."

http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=uninformed

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/paranoia

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/76717-gun-control-group-gives-obama-an-f

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"