Skip to main content

20 years later, still trying to prove O.J.'s guilt

Like a lot of Americans, I was incredibly fascinated by the O.J. Simpson murder case 20+ years ago. I was 14-years-old at the time, grew up in uber-white suburbia West Omaha, was glued to the television set during the Bronco "chase," yet was ignorant on criminal justice, on race relations (African-Americans and the LAPD in particular), on pretty much everything. I remember when the verdict was announced, I was in 8th grade, sitting in study hall, was glued to the TV, yet felt unaffected when I heard the ruling. Unlike most people, I had yet to form an opinion on whether or not Simpson was guilty of murdering Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. Over 20 years later and I've still yet to form a solid opinion on the matter. As a matter of fact, I'm more uncertain now than ever before.

Upon first learning of the verdict, while most white Americans contended O.J. Simpson was guilty and most African-Americans believed otherwise, I had no firm belief one way or the other. I imagine, like many of the jurors must have felt, there were some potential signs of Simpson's guilt, yet I had reasonable doubt, and due to that, couldn't rule him as being guilty.

With Simpson serving time in prison for unrelated charges and so much time having lapsed since his murder trial, I placed the matter at the very back of my mind until recently. After reading glowing reviews of the new FX show, The People V. O.J. Simpson, I decided to give it a gander, and five minutes into the first episode, I became hooked. Oddly enough, not long after the show's premiere, word got out about a knife which was found buried on/near Simpson's former residence, yes, 20+ years after the fact. While the 24-hour news media reported this story like it was bound to ultimately prove Simpson's guilt, most law experts disagreed, saying the size of the knife differed from the one used in the attacks; that, given the passage of time, fingerprints would be of no value; and due to the double-jeopardy law, there would be no way for the knife to result in Simpson being found guilty of the same crime he was tried for 21 years ago. In other words, unless blood of Nicole Brown Simpson and/or Ron Goldman are found on the knife, it'll be more worthless than a mechanical pencil at a knife fight.

Perhaps one day we'll learn the whole truth regarding the O.J. Simpson murder case, but for the time being, I think it's difficult to fully conclude one way or the other, and I'll just have to accept this as one of those unsolved mysteries which may forever be such.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"