Skip to main content

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks out against "moocher 'Muricans" while on permanent vacation

Sipping on his fourth mojito and having his feet rubbed by Sean Hannity, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell took a short break from his busy morning in Cancun to speak with reporters. Given his inebriated status, the Kentucky senator was only able to take one question.

Jorge Ramos: "What do you say to the taxpayers who claim you and your Congressional brethren aren't truly earning your $174,000 salaries? That you do so little for so much, are taking advantage of hard-working Americans, are moochers in a sense, and would be fired if you put so little effort into any other job?"

McConnell: "F**k you! That's what I say! Just kidding... Hey, Jose, or whatever your name is, can you get me another one of these? Make it strong this time! Where was I? Could you repeat the question, Jose?"

Ramos: "That's Jorge..."

McConnell: "That's what I said, Jose."

Ramos: "Jorge... Nevermind... The question was, 'What do you say to the taxpayers who claim you and your Congressional brethren aren't truly earning your $174,000 salaries? That you do so little for so much, are taking advantage of hard-working Americans, are moochers in a sense, and would be fired if you put so little effort into any other job?''

McConnell: "Oh yeah. Thanks, Jose."

Ramos: "Jorge"

McConnell: "I was talking to my server."

Server: "The name's Ricardo."

McConnell: "Close enough. Thanks, amigo. Okay, so back to you, Jose. I think you're shifting focus away from the real issue - welfare recipients, the real moochers! Sure, most of them might already have a job, but just find a better one and work harder, you know? ...and let's be real here; their lives can't be too bad if they're able to spend their food stamps on Trump Steaks or whatever! As I've always said starting right now, 'Once you eat a Trump Steak, you've got it made.' I mean, look at me. This is the greatest job in the world and I'm working harder today than I ever have in Congress! Hey Sean, I need more lotion! 'Rub the lotion on my skin or you'll get the hose again, buddy!' Anyway, back to what I was saying. What was I even saying? This fifth mosquito is really getting to me. Nice going, Jorge! But look Jose, I'll close with this... Lots of welfare recipients might be working hard for next to nothing while I'm making a good living for doing what you see right now. It'd be like if Michael Jordan made less than his teammate benchwarmers back in the day, and that makes a lot of sense when you don't think about it, because America..." :: passes out ::

After awaking several hours later, Senator McConnell began pounding down margaritas while collecting donations from hardworking Americans for the coming election. While doing so, he grabbed the mic from an elderly man proposing to his longtime girlfriend and announced that his new campaign slogan would be, "Work Hard For Me, I'll Bulls*it Harder," before dropping the mic and passing out face first into a bowl of turtle soup.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"