Skip to main content

With Fox "News," Hillary Clinton simply can't win

It's long been known that Fox News likes the Clintons about as much as turkeys like Thanksgiving, but they've been even more ridiculous than usual of late when it comes to their Hillary Clinton-critique.

Following Secretary Clinton's primaries' victory speech on March 15th, Fox's Brit Hume posted these tweets:

- "Hillary having a big night in the primaries. So she's shouting angrily in her victory speech. Supporters loving it. What's she mad at?"

- "Madam, did you not notice the expression on her face? Stern, angry, joyless..."

Not to be outdone, Howard Kurtz and Dana Perino joined in on the fun, posting the following tweets:

Kurtz: "Hillary shouting her speech. She has the floor; a more conversational tone might be better for connecting with folks at home."

Perino: "It is so strange to hear these inspiring words in such an angry tones. #confused #whyisshemad"

Then, just today, I read about Fox guest Monica Crowley stating this after listening to Clinton's foreign policy speech at Stanford University:

"She's a little too calm. You see more passion from Democrats when they're attacking Republicans than when they're attacking actual enemies of the United States."

There you have it, folks; no matter what Hillary Clinton says or how she says it, she'll be met with criticism over at Fox News. Expect to hear a lot of this in the coming weeks and months:

Hillary Clinton speaks passionately

Fox News: "She's too angry!"

She speaks calmly

Fox: "Where's the passion?!?"

Clinton uses sign language

Fox: "That's so arrogant and condescending!"

Hillary gives a little girl a high-five

Fox: "Is she always this violent?!?"

HRC sleeps

Fox: "Lazy! Lazy! Lazy!"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fox-news-hillary-clinton_us_56f30be4e4b04c4c37612c45

http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/03/15/right-wing-medias-sexist-obsession-with-clinton/209282
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more