Skip to main content

Donald Trump is not Adolf Hitler

As ardent readers of mine should know by now, I am in no way, shape, or form a supporter of Republican frontrunner Donald Trump. He comes across as arrogant, angry, greedy, delusional, ill-informed, racist, sexist, xenophobic, and dangerous. If this man gets elected president, I think it would place the United States in a bad spot, both domestically and internationally. He'd further divide this country, which is saying something considering how divided we are already. We'd likely suffer economically, environmentally, educationally, and militarily. I will do anything and everything (within reason) to make certain this man doesn't get elected president. In saying all of that, however, Donald Trump is not Adolf Hitler as some have suggested.

Over the past week, Mexican presidents (past and present), comedians, conservative and liberal columnists, not to mention Democratic and Republican politicians have compared Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler, noting his tone and gestures among other things. While we should all be quite wary of a potential Donald Trump presidency and should do everything in our power to prevent it from happening, making the Hitler comparison is always a difficult, if not downright ridiculous one to make. There can be no questioning the fact that Donald Trump's campaign has been incredibly divisive and offensive. The man has generalized Mexican illegal immigrants as "rapists"; he's called for the temporary ban on Muslims from entering our country; he's insulted prisoners of war; he's poked fun at Asian-Americans; the man hasn't been too quick to disavow David Duke, the Ku Klux Klan, and other white supremacists; he's stereotyped Jewish-Americans; he's teased the disabled; I could go on and on. The man has enthused white supremacist groups. He's even asked rally audience members to raise their hands and pledge (sounds like a chant) to vote for him in primaries, which some Holocaust survivors have complained reminded them of Hitler and Nazi Germany. Of course, Trump has denied it was his intent to offend Holocaust survivors with this pledge, and while I believe him, the optics of it are still quite unpleasant, it was incredibly insensitive, and I have a difficult time believing his ignorance on the matter as he contends. Look, I dislike the thought of a Trump presidency more than just about anyone, but Adolf Hitler was responsible for the death of approximately 6 million Jews during the Holocaust. Let's call Donald Trump out for his seemingly constant hateful, inaccurate, and dangerous comments and policy ideas, but let's not go the hyperbolic route by comparing the man to Hitler. Not only is the comparison an inaccurate one, it temporarily helps the media take its focus off Trump's numerous flip-flops, gaffes, and angry, dangerous rhetoric, and instead place it on the comparison and the inaccuracy of it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"