Skip to main content

Responding to Trump-loving Twitter trollls

Due to the numerous tweets I posted yesterday on the trending hashtag #TrumpSuperpowers, my Twitter account was quite abuzz (https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki). This was especially the case with regard to the following tweet:

"Bashing gay marriage & immigrants after being married three times, twice to immigrants, all while keeping a straight face
#TrumpSuperpowers"

While I received hundreds of "likes" and "retweets" in response to this tweet, I also received a handful of negative comments, such as these:

- "yur a special level of stupid, arent u? (expletive expletive expletive)"

- "There's a huge difference between legal and illegal immigrants, or are you to stupid to know that?"

- "Did you forget to use the word 'illegal'?"

- "Hey, sh*t fer brains, it's illegal immigrants!"

- "At least this man has convictions and is trying to do something!"

I didn't bicker with them long, especially the ones who called me an idiot while misspelling the word "dumb" (apparently it's "dum"). In any case, since I'm not limited to 140 characters here, I thought I'd attempt to thoroughly respond to my tweet-critics.

It's all about facts, sarcasm, and irony. When it comes to the issue of immigration, have illegals largely faced the brunt of Donald Trump's attacks? Yes, however, legal immigrants have been on the receiving end as well, as Trump's said the following:

"...Legal immigrants do not and should not enter easily. It's a long, costly, draining, and often frustrating experience-by design."

He's contradicted himself a number of times on legal immigrants, as he does with most issues, but still, one would be remiss to say he's only gone after illegal immigrants. The man is also so vague at times it's difficult to know whether he's talking about legal immigrants, illegals, or a combination of the two. Heck, the man appears to confuse the two at times, as he showcased with this tweet:

"Jeb Bush has to like the Mexican illegals because of his wife."

So, so much for the he-only-talks-about-illegals argument.

As for the irony and sarcasm, the whole legal-vs.-illegal argument is moot. As CNN's Chris Frates writes, "It's more than a little ironic that a guy as hardline on immigration as Donald Trump has been surrounded by immigrants his entire life, starting from the very beginning."

Trump's mom was born in Scotland. His current wife was born in Slovenia and became a United States citizen a year after they were wed. The Donald's first wife was born in Czechoslovakia. The two of them were married in 1977 and she didn't become a U.S. citizen for another 11 years. Let's not even go into detail about illegal immigrants who have worked for Trump...

So I don't care what one's stance is on illegal immigration or immigration in general, it's more than a little ironic, and with that humorous, that Donald Trump, who is the son of one immigrant, has married two others, and has been the boss of who knows how many more, is so steadfast against immigration, illegals in particular (but also in limiting opportunities for legals). It's also ironically humorous the man comes across as increasingly conservative on the gay marriage issue, as he's declared he supports "traditional marriage"/the sanctity of marriage, considering the fact he's been "traditionally married" three times. Yes, based on his life and experiences, Donald Trump is the last person in the world who should be bashing gay marriage and immigration. So Twitter/tweet-critics, I guess the joke's on you...

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/24/politics/donald-trump-immigrant-wives/

http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Donald_Trump_Immigration.htm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/9-outrageous-things-donald-trump-has-said-about-latinos_us_55e483a1e4b0c818f618904b

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/feb/25/marco-rubio/marco-rubio-says-donald-trump-had-pay-1-million-hi/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"