Skip to main content

"Trump just tells it like it is!" No, actually, he doesn't...

When asking Donald Trump supporters what it is they love so much about the Republican candidate, the most common response I hear is, "The guy just tells it like it is."  Well, I'm sorry to disappoint these individuals, but that's anything but the case. Let's take a look at fact-checker Politifact's file on Donald Trump, shall we?

Here are the following rulings Trump has received on the site:

True: 1 (1%)

Mostly True: 7 (7%)

Half True: 15 (14%)

Mostly False: 18 (17%)

False: 43 (41%)

Pants on Fire: 21 (20%)

That's right, ladies and gentlemen, of the 105 graded statements made by Donald Trump, just 8 were ruled as all or mostly true, or 8%. On the other hand, 82 were graded as pants on fire, false, or mostly false, or 78%.

Here are the 21 pants-on-fire claims Trump has made:

- "I don't know anything about David Duke."

- "Says Ted Cruz 'said I was in favor of Libya. I never discussed that subject.'"

- "Says that in the Philippines more than a century ago, Gen. John Pershing 'took 50 bullets, and he dipped them in pigs' blood,' and shot 49 Muslim rebels. 'The 50th person, he said, 'You go back to your people, and you tell them what happened.' And for 25 years, there was a problem.'"

- "Don't believe those phony numbers when you hear 4.9 and 5 percent unemployment. The number's probably 28, 29, as high as 35. In fact, I even heard recently 42 percent."

- "A Trump television ad shows Mexicans swarming over 'our Southern border.'"

- "President Barack Obama 'wants to take in 250,000 (people) from Syria.'"

- "Says crime statistics show blacks kill 81 percent of white homicide victims."

- "'I watched in Jersey City, N.J., where thousands and thousands of people were cheering' as the World Trade Center collapsed."

- "The federal government is sending refugees to states with governors who are 'Republicans, not to the Democrats.'"

- "The Trans-Pacific Partnership 'was designed for China to come in, as they always do, through the back door and totally take advantage of everyone.'"

- "'I never said that' Marco Rubio was Mark Zuckerberg's personal senator."

- "Says Bernie Sanders is going to 'tax you people at 90 percent.'"

- "The unemployment rate may be as high as '42 percent.'"

- "The Mexican government ... they send the bad ones over."

- "The number of illegal immigrants in the United States is '30 million, it could be 34 million.'"

- "The Mexican government forces many bad people into our country."

- "The last quarter, it was just announced, our gross domestic product ... was below zero. Who ever heard of this? It's never below zero."

- "Says President Barack Obama's recent New York fundraising trip 'cost between $25 million to $50 million.'"

- "After the U.S.-led military alliance ejected Saddam Hussein's forces from Kuwait in 1991, the Kuwaitis 'never paid us.'"

- "CNN did a poll recently where Obama and I are statistically tied."

- "The people that went to school with (Barack Obama), they never saw him, they don't know who he is."

Now let's compare Trump's Politifact file to the other five remaining candidates (excluding Ben Carson, who's on his way out of the race). I'll rank them from the most to the least honest:

1. Hillary Clinton
True/Mostly True: 83 out of 163 (51%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 46 out of 163 (28%)
Net +/-: +23%

2. John Kasich
True/Mostly True: 30 out of 57 (52%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 18 out of 57 (31%)
Net +/-: +21%

3. Bernie Sanders
True/Mostly True: 32 out of 67 (48%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 21 out of 67 (31%)
Net +/-: +17%

4. Marco Rubio
True/Mostly True: 49 out of 138 (35%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 58 out of 138 (42%)
Net +/-: -7%

5. Ted Cruz
True/Mostly True: 20 out of 94 (21%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 62 out of 94 (66%)
Net +/-: -45%

6. Donald Trump
True/Mostly True: 8 out of 105 (8%)
Pants on Fire/False/Mostly False: 82 out of 105 (78%)
Net +/-: -70%

"Donald Trump just tells it like it is!"

No, he doesn't. As a matter of fact, he rarely tells it like it actually is; he simply tells it the way his supporters want to believe things are.

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/ted-cruz/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/marco-rubio/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/john-kasich/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bernie-s/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"