Skip to main content

No, The Donald would NOT be a better president than Hillary...

Courtesy of a Facebook friend, I stumbled upon this meme the other day:

"Share If You Think Trump Would Be A Better President Than Hillary!"

While I can understand why some people have a certain dislike for Hillary Clinton and why some may even feel she's too untrustworthy to lead our country as president, it's beyond ridiculous to claim Donald Trump would make for a better president than the former First Lady and Secretary of State.

Let's step back for a moment and look at this from a general job-hiring perspective.

- Donald Trump has no experience in the field of politics, while Hillary Clinton has been in the political game for over 33 years

- One of Trump's alleged biggest strengths is his business record, yet these following business ventures of his have failed: Trump Airlines, Trump Vodka, Trump Casinos, Trump: The Game, Trump Magazine, Trump Steaks, GoTrump.com, Trump University, and Trump Mortgage, just to name a few

- Hillary Clinton has a great deal of foreign relation experience, meanwhile through Donald Trump's seemingly constant controversial comments and foreign policy ideas, leaders from all over the world have declared they're greatly worried about a potential Trump presidency

- Clinton has continually spoke in terms which indicate she wants to unite the country, while Trump's rhetoric has been so divisive, it's made David Duke grin

- Military leaders have regularly spoken out against Trump's ideas

- Economists have spoken in similar terms about Trump's suggestions to improve jobs and wages

So, there we have it: Economists say Trump would be bad for the economy; military leaders suggest Trump would be bad for our military; world leaders claim Trump would be bad for the world; and racist spokespeople have declared Trump as the best candidate to become our next president. Not only that, but he lacks any kind of experience in the area. So, no, no reasonable job interviewer/boss would be able to listen to these two applicants and say with a straight face, "Donald Trump would definitely be better for this job than Hillary Clinton." If you think the following hypothetical interview makes any kind of rational sense, I suggest you go see a doctor...

Setting: The Oval Office

Interviewer Barack Obama: "So, uh, tell me why you'd, uh, be a good hire to become the next president."

Donald Trump: "I have a lot, and I mean a lot of money. Sure, my dad gave me a very very small loan of $1 million, but, I mean, come on, every kid gets at least a $1 million loan from their dads, you know? What other kids turned their tiny $1 million loan into billions and billions? No one. I'm the only one. I made a small amount of money grow more bigly than anyone ever before! I am, to put it simply, I am the greatest!"

Obama: "Okay, and how would you improve this country if you became president?"

Trump: "I'd build a big, beautiful, almost exotic and sensuous wall along our southern border, make the illegal rapist Mexican immigrants build it, and make Mexico pay for it! I'd also make everything better. We'd be so great at everything and win so much, we'd be like that Olympic swimmer guy, what's his name? Phlegmy... Phlegm... Phyllis... Michael Philodendron. Whatever it is, I mean, our food will be better, our water will be better, our money will be better, our sh*t will be better, everything, and I mean everything will be better; that I can guarantee you. We'll even win the gold medal in curling. That's how great we will be at everything. Period!"

Obama: "But how do you plan on doing all this? Mexico has even said, uh, they won't pay for this wall..."

Trump: "Oh yes they will. ...and look, it's now how we do it, or if it's even legal; it's about getting things done, and that's what I'm going to do. Trust me, I know some people who are related to some people who fornicated with some people who learned a lot of important and handy skills while their second cousins were in prison, and they're going to be very very useful in getting many many things done."

Obama: "Well, many well-respected economists have said, uh, they feel your policy ideas will actually hurt the economy. What is your response?"

Trump: "What do they know? Do economists study money, numbers, and jobs or something? No... Who have they hired before? I've hired tens, thousands, hundreds, zillions of people, so I think I know better than some fancy schmancy economists!"

Obama: "Well, actually, economists do... Nevermind... What do you have to say to foreign leaders who feel you presidency would be bad, even dangerous to world affairs?"

Trump: "They're just a bunch of pussies. Look at these hands... Like them? Pretty big, aren't they? You know what that means, don't you? Something else of mine is pretty fricking big! Foreign leaders fear the hand; they fear it really really much!"

Obama: "But what about military leaders who have also stated they fear a Trump presidency and that your ideas in the area would fail on multiple fronts?"

Trump: "Military leaders really don't know our military; I do, okay? I've got the biggest, baddest rocket in all the world, and I'm not afraid to let it go off in everyone's face! Got that?!?"

Obama: "How much experience do you have in the world of politics?"

Trump: "How much experience do you have of being 100% white?"

Obama: "None"

Trump: "Exactly!"

Obama: "Okay then... Segueing from that, you've been known to offend many different demographics throughout the campaign. Could you summarize all the groups you've offended over the past few months?"

Trump: "Sure... Look, Muslims aren't right in the head and shouldn't be allowed here; Mexicans are rapists; women are only good to look at, well, unless you're Carly Fiorina; Asians talk funny; gays are gross; blacks are whiners; Jews are only good for negotiating; the Pope needs to shut his trap; the disabled are too needy; POWs are weak; Ted Cruz is a lying liar; Marco Rubio is a midget; Jeb Bush is like the opposite of an Energizer bunny; John Kasich is like Waldo on the debate stage - I mean, where is he? Is he even there?; oh, but I love, and I mean love the poorly educated."

Obama: "Is there anything else you'd like to say to persuade me to hire you as the leader of the most powerful country in the world?"

Trump: "Yeah, aren't there like seven wonders of the world? My penis should be #8."

Obama: "You're hired!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"