Skip to main content

A Columbus Dispatch Game

Let's play a game. I'm going to share with you a letter-to-the-editor I read in today's Columbus Dispatch, will then provide you some multiple-choice options on what the Dispatch titled the writing, and will then give readers the answer. Sound good?

Okay, so first off, here is the letter-to-the-editor, which was written by Ray Cacchione of Columbus, Ohio:

"I admire Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump for coming right out and saying that women who get abortions should get 'some form of punishment' as opposed to the usual manner of Republican legislators punishing women by curtailing their reproductive rights ('Trump talk on abortion shocks many,' Dispatch article, Thursday).

He is wrong, but at least he's honest, which is more than I can say about Gov. John Kasich (who just cut Planned Parenthood funding in Ohio) or Texas Sen. Ted Cruz."

So, having read that, what do you think the Dispatch decided to title the piece?

A) Trump Is Wrong As Always

B) Trump's Honest, But Wrong

C) Thoughts On Trump's Abortion Comments

D) Trump Says What Others Think

E) Trump Just Said What Kasich and Cruz Did

:: plays the Jeopardy soundtrack on repeat for a few minutes ::

...and the answer is... (scroll down)








D) Trump Says What Others Think. That's right, even though the writer said Trump is wrong when it comes to his stance on abortion and insinuated that his recent controversial comments on the matter were ridiculous, the Dispatch decided to title the piece, "Trump Says What Others Think." Either the Dispatch is getting incredibly lazy or they accidentally let their biases slip out into the open (again). In any case, this is a big-time fail for the paper. Sadly, it's not the first time I've run into this problem with the Dispatch, and chances are it won't be the last...

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2016/04/02/1-trump-says-what-others-think.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i...