Skip to main content

Headlines vs. Reality

There are times I really wonder if reporters have any idea what they're writing about. British rock trio Muse have been touring worldwide to help promote their latest album, Drones. In response to one of their recent London shows, I've seen the following headlines over the past 24-48 hours:

- "Drones collapse during Muse Concert at the 02 Arena"

- "Watch Muse Drone Crash Into Audience During Concert"

- "Muse Drone Crashes Into Crowd During Concert: Watch"

- "Watch Muse's drone crash into crowd during London gig"

- "Watch a Drone at a Muse Concert Crash Into the Crowd"

- "That Awkward Moment: Drone Crashes Into Crowd at Muse Concert"

In most of these articles the author(s) noted that fortunately, nobody was injured during this apparent mishap. So, this "drone" crashing into the crowd was made to sound like a potentially serious incident, correct? Well, brace yourselves, people, because it wasn't - the drone was inflatable. That's right, the media made a big deal about an inflatable drone falling into a crowd at a concert. Due to the misleading headlines with regard to this story, expect the media to publish the following headlines at some point in the future:

- "Boy almost killed by floating balloon at 6th birthday party"

- "Inflatable doll apparently didn't take her Zoloft, almost strangles owner"

- "Clown's unidentifiable balloon animal goes extinct, could cause major problems in food chain"

- "Inflatable raft banned from water park for cussing out group of Boy Scouts"

- "Inflatable mattress accused of shooting owner's mistress, Stella"

https://www.google.com/search?q=muse+drones&oq=muse+drones&aqs=chrome..69i57j0j69i60l3j0.1961j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=muse+drones&tbm=nws
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more