Skip to main content

Dear anti-Clinton Sanders supporters and anti-Sanders Clinton supporters...

Dear anti-Clinton Sanders supporters and anti-Sanders Clinton supporters:

While I can understand your passion for one of the two Democratic candidates, if your candidate doesn't win the party's nomination and many of us stay home on election day in November, we'll get this...




Comments

  1. I think most reasonable people try to be fair when dealing with two or more opposing sides. Many times, however, we have to deal with disparate factions, and we don't do ourselves or anyone else favors by presenting a false equivalency.
    We know by the detailed reporting being done by many outlets that Clinton's supporters tend to be older while Sanders supporters are a typically younger, college aged group. Because of this and the specific messages of the campaigns we see a much higher level of passion in Bernie's people than Hillary's. This is well reported. We're increasingly seeing more of Sanders supporters express an unwillingness to support HRC than the other way around. A survey released yesterday shows 30% of his supporters will not vote for Hillary if she's the nominee compared to 15% of her supporters. That 30% is higher than the PUMA's (Party Unity My A**) for Clinton in 2008 right before she endorsed Obama. That's not good news for November. These hard core Sanders supporters have spokespeople like Susan Sarandon who said in a national interview that she'd not vote if Bernie didn't get the nomination and clearly implied it would be better if Trump won in that case so that the ensuing chaos would essentially wipe the board so the country could start fresh.
    This "burn it down" mentality is pretty much just below the surface of most of his supporters I've spoken to at two of his events.
    What troubles me more than anything is that Senator Sanders has been stoking outright anger, distrust and fear of Clinton that will be all but impossible to pull people back from if he's not the nominee and needs to help unite the party.
    This may all sound clear cut as to where my vote lies. It doesn't. I voted for Bernie in the Texas primary. Because of what I've seen since then though I'm very worried about what will happen between now and the convention. If Hillary wins I'll gladly vote for her with no reservations but for now I support Senator Sanders. I believe in his priorities and I genuinely believe he's made a strong enough case for them that she would prioritize them if she wins. She's said as much. I believe a person should be judged by their actions rather than their words and there's nothing I've seen in her past that gives me doubts about her keeping her word. If there were I'd be a Republican.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your thorough response. It sounds like you and I are of similar mindsets when it comes to this election. I too voted for Sanders in the (Ohio) primary, but have also grown increasingly more concerned that some of his rhetoric, as well as that by a few of his celebrity supporters, may come back to bite Hillary Clinton in November if she is the Democratic nominee. I can't give accurate percentages, but I've received several comments on my Twitter feed from Sanders supporters which have stated they'll vote for Trump in November over Clinton. I still have a difficult time seeing Trump defeat Clinton if they square off in the November election, but if enough Sanders supporters either vote for Trump or stay home, who knows?

      I do find this somewhat reminiscent of the 2008 primary. I was in the Obama camp, and there was a great deal of worry that Clinton supporters wouldn't vote for Obama in the election, not unless he named her as his running mate anyway. Fortunately the two sides were able to coalesce, but not without tension and worries. Regardless of who the eventual nominee is, hopefully things follow a similar path this go-round. :: crosses fingers ::

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"