Skip to main content

For GOPers, is honesty really the best policy?

Being a lover of numbers and fascinated (yet disturbed) by the Republican primary, I thought I'd dig a bit deeper into the Republican candidates' level of honesty this campaign season. In alphabetical order, here are the 17 GOP candidates which have run for the party's nomination this coming election, along with a few grades handed to each of them by fact-checker Politifact:

Jeb Bush: Of 79 graded statements, 38 have been ruled true or mostly true (48%), 24 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (31%), for a net +17%

Ben Carson: Of 27 graded statements, 1 has been ruled true or mostly true (4%), 23 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (85%), for a net -81%

Chris Christie: Of 100 graded statements, 39 have been ruled true or mostly true (39%), 35 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false, for a net +4%

Ted Cruz: Of 102 graded statements, 22 have been ruled true or mostly true (22%), 67 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (65%), for a net -43%

Carly Fiorina: Of 22 graded statements, 6 have been ruled true or mostly true (28%), 12 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (55%), for a net -27%

Jim Gilmore: Of 1 graded statement, 1 has been ruled true or mostly true (100%), 0 have been graded pants on fire, false, or mostly false (0%), for a net +100%

Lindsey Graham: Of 12 graded statements, 4 have been ruled true or mostly true (34%), 4 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (34%), for a net +/-0%

Mike Huckabee: Of 41 graded statements, 11 have been ruled true or mostly true (27%), 21 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (51%), for a net -24%

Bobby Jindal: Of 10 graded statements, 5 have been ruled true or mostly true (50%), 1 has been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (10%), for a net +40%

John Kasich: Of 61 graded statements, 31 have been ruled true or mostly true (51%), 20 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (33%), for a net +18%

George Pataki: Of 1 graded statement, 0 have been ruled true or mostly true (0%), 1 has been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (100%), for a net -100%

Rand Paul: Of 51 graded statements, 23 have been ruled true or mostly true (46%), 18 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (36%), for a net +10%

Rick Perry: Of 169 graded statements, 49 have been ruled true or mostly true (29%), 78 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (47%), for a net -18%

Marco Rubio: Of 139 graded statements, 50 have been ruled true or mostly true (36%), 58 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (42%), for a net -6%

Rick Santorum: Of 59 graded statements, 13 have been ruled true or mostly true (22%), 33 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (55%), for a net -33%

Donald Trump: Of 124 graded statements, 10 have been ruled true or mostly true (8%), 95 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (76%), for a net -68%

Scott Walker: Of 166 graded statements, 58 have been ruled true or mostly true (35%), 77 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (47%), for a net -12%

Here now are the rankings of the candidates, ordered from most to least honest:

1. Jim Gilmore: 1 graded statement, net +100%
2. Bobby Jindal: 10 graded statements, net +40%
3. John Kasich: 61 graded statements, net +18%
4. Jeb Bush: 79 graded statements, net +17%
5. Rand Paul: 51 graded statements, net +10%
6. Chris Christie: 100 graded statements, net +4%
7. Lindsey Graham: 12 graded statements, net +/-0%
8. Marco Rubio: 139 graded statements, net -6%
9. Scott Walker: 166 graded statements, net -12%
10. Rick Perry: 169 graded statements, net -18%
11. Mike Huckabee: 41 graded statements, net -24%
12. Carly Fiorina: 22 graded statements, net -27%
13. Rick Santorum: 59 graded statements, net -33%
14. Ted Cruz: 102 graded statements, net -43%
15. Donald Trump: 124 graded statements, net -68%
16. Ben Carson: 27 graded statements, net -81%
17. George Pataki: 1 graded statement, net -100%

Overall: Of 1,164 graded statements, 361 have been ruled true or mostly true (31%), 567 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (49%), for a net -18%

These numbers are incredible to me. The supposed party of God, family values, and personal responsibility have sent 17 candidates our way this election season, and these candidates tell the truth less than 1/3 of the time, while lying approximately 1/2 of the time. Heck, if we exclude Jim Gilmore and Bobby Jindal from the list, who only have a combined 11 statements graded by Politifact, just four of the candidates tell the truth more than they lie. Not only that, but ever since Donald Trump announced his candidacy, only two other candidates have led in national polls among Republican voters, Ted Cruz and Ben Carson. That's right; over the past 9 months, only Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and Ben Carson have led the party in the polls. Let's take a closer look at those three candidates...

Ben Carson: Of 27 graded statements, 1 has been ruled true or mostly true (4%), 23 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (85%), for a net -81%

Ted Cruz: Of 102 graded statements, 22 have been ruled true or mostly true (22%), 67 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (65%), for a net -43%

Donald Trump: Of 124 graded statements, 10 have been ruled true or mostly true (8%), 95 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (76%), for a net -68%

Overall: Of 253 graded statements, 33 have been ruled true or mostly true (13%), 185 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (73%), for a net -60%. This includes 35 claims which have been ruled as pants on fire (14%). Yes, between Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, and Ben Carson, there have been more pants-on-fire whoppers told than accurate statements. Let that sink in for a moment.

Meanwhile, Politifact has provided the following grades for the five Democratic candidates of this primary season:

Lincoln Chafee: 7 of 18 graded statements have been ruled true or mostly true (39%), 8 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (35%), for a net +4%

Hillary Clinton: 92 of 180 graded statements have been ruled true or mostly true (51%), 51 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (28%), for a net +23%

Martin O'Malley: 4 of 18 graded statements have been ruled true or mostly true (22%), 4 of 18 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (22%), for a net +/-0%

Bernie Sanders: 40 of 80 graded statements have been ruled true or mostly true (50%), 24 of 80 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (30%), for a net +20%

Jim Webb: 8 of 10 graded statements have been ruled true or mostly true (80%), 1 has been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (10%), for a net +70%

Overall: Of 306 graded statements, 151 have been ruled true or mostly true (49%), 88 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (29%), for a net +20%. Not only that, but between the five candidates, four have gone without making a ridiculous pants-on-fire claim (Clinton being the only one who has), and have combined to utter just 3 such statements (0.01%).

Party Breakdown
Republican candidates: Of 1,164 graded statements, 361 have been ruled true or mostly true (31%), 567 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (49%), for a net -18%

Democratic candidates: Of 306 graded statements, 151 have been ruled true or mostly true (49%), 88 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (29%), for a net +20%.

Difference: Democratic candidates +38%/Republican candidates -38%

Republican frontrunners: Of 253 graded statements, 33 have been ruled true or mostly true (13%), 185 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (73%), for a net -60% (35 have been ruled as pants on fire (14%)

Democratic frontrunners: Of 260 graded statements, 132 have been ruled true or mostly true (51%), 75 have been ruled pants on fire, false, or mostly false (29%), for a net +22% (3 have been ruled as pants on fire (0.01%)

Difference: Democratic frontrunners +82%/Republican frontrunners -82%

Yes, it appears that the supposed party of God, family values, and personal responsibility, the GOP, also thinks the way to earn God's love and illustrate good family values is through lying, and that the only way to showcase personal responsibility is by consistently denying or backtracking from said lies. What would Jesus do? Chances are the polar opposite of the Republican Party...

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/ted-cruz/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/john-kasich/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/ben-carson/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/chris-christie/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/jeb-bush/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/marco-rubio/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/lindsey-graham/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bobby-jindal/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/jim-gilmore/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/george-pataki/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rick-santorum/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rick-perry/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/mike-huckabee/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rand-paul/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/carly-fiorina/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/scott-walker/

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html#polls

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bernie-s/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/martin-omalley/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/lincoln-chafee/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/jim-webb/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"