Skip to main content

9/11 shouldn't just be a bumper sticker

I can't tell you how many times I saw the words "Never forget" or "We'll never forget" sprayed all over the internet yesterday - social networking sites in particular. This was with regard to yesterday being the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. As strange as it may sound initially, the more I saw these words, the more irritated I became.

The reason for this is it came across to me like a bumper sticker. Whenever I see these bumper stickers that say things like "I support the troops" or "I love my country," I want to sarcastically give them the slow clap, as I think to myself, "Well, gee, congratulations! How about showing this support or love through more than just a bumper sticker?"

"We'll never forget" and "I support the troops" are just words. They don't mean much when in isolation. Wounded veterans aren't going to see that bumper sticker. They're not going to feel that support. Politicians won't know what the people want them to do to prevent another such attack if we just say the words "Well never forget about 9/11." Sure, admitting an event occurred, just like admitting a problem, is the first step in the long process of preventing that event from occurring again or getting over said problem. However, it feels like all the majority of this country has done for the past 12 years is once a year, post a bumper sticker-esque slogan on the Internet which claims that we'll never forget about that horrendous day. Unfortunately, to me this shows that most of this country, even a dozen years after the fact, still haven't looked beyond the what to the why and how. In other words, we know what happened and we'll never forget it, however, why did it occur and how can we minimalize the chance of it occurring again?

If a person gets abused by their partner and says to them, "I'll never forget this," but continues living with the person and doesn't suggest any changes that need to be made, he or she may not ever forget what ensued that day, but will anything be learned by either party? Similarly, while United States citizens may never forget what happened on 9/11, did most of us not learn much from that experience, which would leave us more apt to falling victim to such an attack in the future?

Ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan I think are a start, as well as not attacking Syria. However, if the right (or wrong depending on how one looks at it) people get elected at a certain point, will they too claim that they'll never forget about 9/11, yet set forth actions which leave us more prone to experiencing another such day?

The phrase of the day yesterday shouldn't have just been, "We'll never forget." It should have been, "We'll never forget and will do everything in our power to learn from 9/11 and make certain it never happens again." Unfortunately, that statement isn't quick and catchy bumper sticker material, so there's less chance of it being spread about in this day and age than of a nun contracting herpes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...