Skip to main content

9/11 shouldn't just be a bumper sticker

I can't tell you how many times I saw the words "Never forget" or "We'll never forget" sprayed all over the internet yesterday - social networking sites in particular. This was with regard to yesterday being the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. As strange as it may sound initially, the more I saw these words, the more irritated I became.

The reason for this is it came across to me like a bumper sticker. Whenever I see these bumper stickers that say things like "I support the troops" or "I love my country," I want to sarcastically give them the slow clap, as I think to myself, "Well, gee, congratulations! How about showing this support or love through more than just a bumper sticker?"

"We'll never forget" and "I support the troops" are just words. They don't mean much when in isolation. Wounded veterans aren't going to see that bumper sticker. They're not going to feel that support. Politicians won't know what the people want them to do to prevent another such attack if we just say the words "Well never forget about 9/11." Sure, admitting an event occurred, just like admitting a problem, is the first step in the long process of preventing that event from occurring again or getting over said problem. However, it feels like all the majority of this country has done for the past 12 years is once a year, post a bumper sticker-esque slogan on the Internet which claims that we'll never forget about that horrendous day. Unfortunately, to me this shows that most of this country, even a dozen years after the fact, still haven't looked beyond the what to the why and how. In other words, we know what happened and we'll never forget it, however, why did it occur and how can we minimalize the chance of it occurring again?

If a person gets abused by their partner and says to them, "I'll never forget this," but continues living with the person and doesn't suggest any changes that need to be made, he or she may not ever forget what ensued that day, but will anything be learned by either party? Similarly, while United States citizens may never forget what happened on 9/11, did most of us not learn much from that experience, which would leave us more apt to falling victim to such an attack in the future?

Ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan I think are a start, as well as not attacking Syria. However, if the right (or wrong depending on how one looks at it) people get elected at a certain point, will they too claim that they'll never forget about 9/11, yet set forth actions which leave us more prone to experiencing another such day?

The phrase of the day yesterday shouldn't have just been, "We'll never forget." It should have been, "We'll never forget and will do everything in our power to learn from 9/11 and make certain it never happens again." Unfortunately, that statement isn't quick and catchy bumper sticker material, so there's less chance of it being spread about in this day and age than of a nun contracting herpes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"