Skip to main content

A Nigerian student believes magnets prove homosexuality is wrong

I've heard a lot of ridiculous anti-gay arguments from the religious community, but now we can add one from the science community to the ever-growing list. Well, I should probably re-phrase that and refer to it as the wannabe-science community.

Chibuihem Amalaha - a postgraduate student at the University of Lagos (Nigeria) - told Nigeria's This Day Live that gay marriage is "eating deep into the fabric of our human nature all over the world."

He then talked about his scientific findings based on experiments he conducted, which he believes showcase homosexuality to be wrong, saying:

"A bar magnet is a horizontal magnet that has the North Pole and the South Pole and when you bring two bar magnets and you bring the North Pole together you find that the two North Poles will not attract. They will repel, that is, they will push away themselves showing that a man should not attract a man. If you bring two South Poles together you find that the two South Poles will not attract a female as South Pole of a magnet does not attract the South Pole of a magnet. But, when you bring a North Pole of a magnet and a South Pole of a magnet they will attract because they are not the same, indicating that a man will attract a woman because of the way nature has made a female."

It's that simple, folks. Mr. Amalaha added that he hopes to win a Nobel Prize one day for his findings. No, that's not a joke. You can stop laughing now.

Mr. Amalaha is right on the money with his genius findings. When I think about human's sexual attraction toward one another, the first things that spring to mind are magnets.

If Einstein were alive today, he'd say something similar: "See these magnets? Same ends? No, no. You see? Opposite ends? That's penal-vaginal penetration right there, so, yes. It works. You see? Very good."

Based on this wondrous finding by Mr. Amalaha, I'm guessing he'll make the following findings one day to further prove the immorality of homosexuality:


Object: Books

Explanation: "When reading a book, you have to read it from beginning to end in order to have read the book in its entirety and to be able to fully understand it. It won't work if the book has two ends and no middle or beginning. That just won't work and it's very similar to homosexuals not working. The nature of a book, just like the nature of humans, is a beginning and an end - not two ends."

Future: "I really hope to win a Nobel Prize for this."


Object: Football

Explanation: "Football is a very nasty, dirty sport, and it can be no coincidence that a football is brown. Brown is the typical color of poop. Everything about football and poop are wrong, so that means homosexuality is wrong, because of how the deed is done."

Future: "I hope to win a Nobel Prize for this one day."


Object: Car

Explanation: "You can only turn a car on by turning the key the right way. If you turn it the other way, it won't work and you'll wind up ruining something. The same thing goes with sexual relationships. Men are the keys and women are the ignitions, since our bodies are made for one another. If two men or women try to make that work, the key goes the wrong way and ruins their bodies."

Future: "I hope to win a Nobel Prize one day for this."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/16/nigerian-student-gay-marriage_n_3934518.html?ref=topbar

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...