Skip to main content

What I learned in Week 1 of the NFL regular season

While one can't learn a great deal from just one week of a season, here is what I personally learned after the first week of the NFL regular season:

- Referees don't seem to like the Green Bay Packers much in the opening week of the regular season. Next year, the Pack may just want to rest their guys through week 1 and start the season in week 2 at 0-1.

- Tom Brady may be one of the greatest quarterbacks in the history of the game, but he's just one guy, and after watching the Patriots' last-second win against Buffalo, it's safe to say Brady has less help on the field than minorities have voting in North Carolina.

- Ditto for Adrian Peterson

- The Pittsburgh Steelers just aren't very good anymore. Ben Roethlisberger gets less protection than a streaker at the Thanksgiving Day Parade.

- ESPN is more skeptical about Chip Kelly's offense in Philadelphia than parents are when told by kids with chocolate all over their faces that they didn't eat a chocolate chip cookie. 

- The Anquan Boldin deal makes the San Francisco 49ers look like Harvard graduates while the Baltimore Ravens are still pondering about whether or not to get their GEDs.

- Only Tony Romo and the Dallas Cowboys can get handed six turnovers and still almost lose. Nevermind - the Cleveland Browns could probably do that as well.

- Speaking of which, the Browns still play like they sound - like a pile of brown, stinky crap.

- Ndamukong Suh will have to start playing two-hand touch with his opponents if he doesn't want to get penalized, fined, and/or suspended on a weekly basis.

- Whenever a starting quarterback struggles, someone in the media will ask the question, "Will Tim Tebow get the call?," even though I know a 7-year old who throws the football better than him.

- Alabama could beat the Jacksonville Jaguars.

- Andrew Luck's last name seems fitting at times.

- Robert Griffin III (sorry, RGIII) could urinate in a bush on a person's lawn and ESPN would give him a standing ovation, saying it was a classy move and more people should start doing it.

- The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are less disciplined than Pat Robertson is sane.

- San Diego doesn't believe in 60-minute games anymore.

- Cam Newton, for the third straight season, is still "one year away."

- More things get blown out of proportion by the sports media than learned.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more