Skip to main content

Tea Partier: "Voting us out is totalitarian!"

With the government shutdown looming, Twitter has exploded with lovely back-and-forths between Tea Partiers in support of the shutdown to delay Obamacare for a year and moderates and liberals whom don't want a government shutdown, regardless of what they think of the healthcare bill.

Tea Partiers have gone after a couple of my comments, which I'll briefly write about in a couple of separate blogs. This may be my favorite of the two responses.

My tweet was, "Here's an idea - shut down the Tea Party so the government can actually function."

It has been my belief that the Tea Party, so long as President Obama is running the show, doesn't want the government to function. They've attempted to place the government on shutdown since the Republican Party took control of the House in 2011. Their sole focus it seems has been on getting rid of Obamacare. Even though Democrats control the Senate and Oval Office, House Republicans have attempted to repeal the bill over 40 times. They then attempted to defund parts, which failed as well. Now they're going the delay-route. If this fails, they contend they won't back down, which will force a government shutdown, which seemed to be their goal all along.

Without the Tea Party, I believe Congressional Democrats and Republicans would be able to get more done. However, with the Tea Party involved, it seems as if compromise is no longer an option. Due to this, I sincerely hope American voters vote these extremists out of office in 2014 and beyond so we can be void of their destruction in Washington and elsewhere. That's all I was saying with my tweet. However, that's not how one Tea Partier took it.

He said: "Tea Partiers got elected like anybody else. What you're suggesting is totally totalitarian!"

Yeah, totally... While it's perfectly acceptable for a party to take the U.S. economy hostage over a bill which was signed by a president who was democratically elected and re-elected by the American people, voting Tea Partiers out of office through a democratic process is "totally" totalitarian indeed...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"