Skip to main content

Yahoo's NFL power rankings (based on the preseason...)

As long-time readers will know, I'm an ardent opponent of college football preseason rankings. What may be even more ridiculous is seeing NFL preseason rankings, especially those primarily based on teams' preseason performances.

Yeah, based on preseason records, we could possibly see the Cleveland Browns square off against the Arizona Cardinals in the Super Bowl, or the Geno Smith-led New York Jets against the Washington Redskins, who were without starting quarterback Robert Griffin III for all four preseason games, yet won them all.

That brings me to Frank Schwab of Yahoo Sports, who just released his NFL power rankings before any team has played a regular season game.

Here are some of Schwab's rankings and observations:

22. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: "And still, after four preseason games, the Buccaneers remain the toughest team to predict in the NFL."

After four preseason games of playing 2nd- and 3rd-stringers more than starters, just about every team is unpredictable if we largely base these predictions on the preseason games.

16. Detroit Lions: "The win against the Patriots showed what Detroit can do at its best. But Matthew Stafford showed some serious warning signs in August."

At their best? Their first-team offense scored 16 points on the Pats' first-team defense. Their second- and third-stringers, though, were something else!

14. Indianapolis Colts: "Andrew Luck might be an MVP candidate this year. If he is, it's because T.Y. Hilton played as well as he did in the preseason."

Luck should improve a great deal in his second season with the team, but let's calm down on the MVP talk. After all, last year Luck finished: 31st in completion percentage (54.1), 17th in yards per attempt (6.98), 3rd in interceptions (18), 4th in sacks (41), and 26th in quarterback rating (76.5).

11. Carolina Panthers: "Cam Newton always struggles in the preseason. The difference is, the Panthers' defense doesn't always look as dominant as it did this August."

So, it's all about preseason production for 99% of the guys, but Cam Newton gets a pass, eh? I see.

5. Houston Texans: "Arian Foster's issues seem to have been overblown, Brian Cushing is back, DeAndre Hopkins is legit .. yet nobody is talking about the Texans."

I believe you just did...

4. Cincinnati Bengals: "If anything, seeing Giovani Bernard look like he belongs in the NFL solidifies them as an AFC dark horse."

I'm sorry, but Cincinnati at #4?

3. New England Patriots: "You worry about how they looked in that third preseason game against Detroit, I'll remember how perfect they were the week before against Tampa Bay."

Tampa Bay? You mean, the most unpredictable team in football? Losing Wes Welker, Aaron Hernandez, Brandon Lloyd, and Danny Woodhead won't have any effect on the team's offensive production? With Rob Gronkowski battling more injuries than groupies battle STDs?

1. Seattle Seahawks: "It's just the preseason, but their demolition of the Broncos' starters in Week 2 was a real eye-opener."

The real eye-opener was reading these power rankings. Mr. Schwab should have titled his piece, "It's just the preseason" and stopped right there.

In any case, the regular season officially starts tomorrow and I can't wait!

"Are you ready for some football?"

Hell yeah!

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/nfl-preview-week-shutdown-corner-pre-regular-season-131607988--nfl.html

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/quarterbackRating

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"