Skip to main content

Not everyone seems happy about the peace talks with Syria

With Syria appearing to accept Russia's proposal to hand over its chemical weapons, it will most likely prevent any U.S. strike on the country. In my mind, this is a very good thing. Achieving what we want through diplomatic means and not military force will save us money, lives, and drastically decrease potential terrorist backlash from Syrian extremists. However, not everyone feels this way.

Many bobblehead dolls over at Fox News and even some war-hungry politicians (::ahem, Senator McCain::), without the need for Viagra, seemed to get hard at the thought of war, and are beginning to go limp in light of these proposed peace talks. According to them, if President Obama doesn't follow through with air strikes on Syria, then not only will all of them go limp, so too will the Washington Monument and the rest of America!

Yes, because even though using military force on Syria would increase the chance for another war, more money spent, more lives lost, and falling victim to another terrorist attack, it's better to leave one more vulnerable to those risks than to look like a pussy by not bombing somebody. With that kind of logic, the following scenarios would also make sense:

Scenario: Major drug deal near a public park 

President Obama: "Alright, there's a heavy-duty drug deal that's supposedly going to go down near a public park today. The dealers think we won't do much since kids will likely be in the area at the time. I heard Senator McCain suggest we just start firing machine guns in the area. While I can understand wanting to get these drug dealers once and for all, if we do that, we'll be endangering the lives of kids and their parents as well. I just don't know about that."

Senator McCain: "Come on, don't be a pussy!"


Scenario: Gang fight near a nursery

President Obama: "Word has it that a pair of gangs are going to battle for the corner by a nursery in the area. Senator McCain just told me he thinks we should send some of our strongest men out there to punch everyone that moves. I guess my only question is, what if we punch the wrong people, and women and children are hit?"

Senator McCain: "Come on, don't be a pussy!"


Scenario: Man steals a car

President Obama: "So, I guess a guy stole a car in the area. I think we should go about this thing quietly and catch him fairly soon, but Senator McCain had another idea. He suggested we get into a high-speed chase with the guy. Kids were just let out of school, though. Wouldn't this chase endanger these kids in school buses and other people as well? Would the chase really be worth it?"

McCain: "Come on, don't be a pussy!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...