Skip to main content

Dinesh D'Souza + Thanksgiving tweet = Jerky McJerkington

Just yesterday, former Ronald Reagan policy analyst and co-director of the anti-Obama film 2016: Obama's America - Dinesh D'Souza - decided to make the following Thanksgiving Day tweet, before deleting it later in the afternoon:

"I am thankful this week when I remember that America is big enough and great enough to survive a Grown-Up Trayvon in the White House!"

At first glance, this tweet didn't make a great deal of sense to me, but until D'Souza explains himself, I'm left with the following possible interpretations:

1) Racism - Many right-wing commentators have labeled both Trayvon Martin and President Obama as thugs. While they may defend their label by saying, "That's not racist," if you were to ask them what a thug looks like, they'd likely respond with, "Someone like Trayvon or Obama." In other words, thug = black thug.

2) Confusion - President Obama has admitted to experimenting with drugs many years ago. Perhaps D'Souza thinks he's also fond of carrying around ice tea and a bag of Skittles while wearing a hoodie while walking in neighborhoods.

3) Shallow - D'Souza may not have been thinking a great deal at the time of the tweet, which seems to be quite commonplace for him, and tried to cleverly spin Obama's previous comment about how he could have been  Trayvon Martin many years ago. Of course, this quote by the president dealt with the hardship many African-Americans face in this country with prejudice. So, if this was the intent of Mr. D'Souza, he obviously didn't think about the matter very thoroughly.

4) Denial - Mr. D'Souza may have forgotten or still been in denial about the fact that Trayvon Martin was the one who was followed, shot, and killed by George Zimmerman, and made this tweet, without even thinking about how that could potentially relate to a madman attempting to assassinate the president.

5) Stupidity - Lastly, I wouldn't put it past Dinesh D'Souza to have woken up yesterday morning from a deep slumber and, without thinking much about it, tweeted the first Thanksgiving-Day sentence that sprung to mind.

While the quantity of interpretations to Dinesh D'Souza's tweet are numerous, none of these interpretations place him in a positive light. One thing I'm thankful for this week is that I don't have the demented mind of Dinesh D'Souza.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/26/dinesh-dsouza-trayvon-tweet_n_4345318.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...