Skip to main content

Dinesh D'Souza + Thanksgiving tweet = Jerky McJerkington

Just yesterday, former Ronald Reagan policy analyst and co-director of the anti-Obama film 2016: Obama's America - Dinesh D'Souza - decided to make the following Thanksgiving Day tweet, before deleting it later in the afternoon:

"I am thankful this week when I remember that America is big enough and great enough to survive a Grown-Up Trayvon in the White House!"

At first glance, this tweet didn't make a great deal of sense to me, but until D'Souza explains himself, I'm left with the following possible interpretations:

1) Racism - Many right-wing commentators have labeled both Trayvon Martin and President Obama as thugs. While they may defend their label by saying, "That's not racist," if you were to ask them what a thug looks like, they'd likely respond with, "Someone like Trayvon or Obama." In other words, thug = black thug.

2) Confusion - President Obama has admitted to experimenting with drugs many years ago. Perhaps D'Souza thinks he's also fond of carrying around ice tea and a bag of Skittles while wearing a hoodie while walking in neighborhoods.

3) Shallow - D'Souza may not have been thinking a great deal at the time of the tweet, which seems to be quite commonplace for him, and tried to cleverly spin Obama's previous comment about how he could have been  Trayvon Martin many years ago. Of course, this quote by the president dealt with the hardship many African-Americans face in this country with prejudice. So, if this was the intent of Mr. D'Souza, he obviously didn't think about the matter very thoroughly.

4) Denial - Mr. D'Souza may have forgotten or still been in denial about the fact that Trayvon Martin was the one who was followed, shot, and killed by George Zimmerman, and made this tweet, without even thinking about how that could potentially relate to a madman attempting to assassinate the president.

5) Stupidity - Lastly, I wouldn't put it past Dinesh D'Souza to have woken up yesterday morning from a deep slumber and, without thinking much about it, tweeted the first Thanksgiving-Day sentence that sprung to mind.

While the quantity of interpretations to Dinesh D'Souza's tweet are numerous, none of these interpretations place him in a positive light. One thing I'm thankful for this week is that I don't have the demented mind of Dinesh D'Souza.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/26/dinesh-dsouza-trayvon-tweet_n_4345318.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"