Skip to main content

The GOP is obsessed with Obamacare

It's official - Republicans are obsessed with Obamacare. If Obamacare were a woman, Congressional Republicans would likely be stalking it, and Obamacare would go to court for a restraining order.

The House Committee on Science, Space and Technology recently held a hearing on the Environmental Protection Agency's transparency and accountability. This was bound to be interesting since 17 out of 22 Republican members of the committee don't believe in global warming.

Things got a little weird when Georgia Representative Paul Broun engaged in the following back-and-forth with EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy:

Broun: "Let me ask you one more question because my time's running out. Are you signed up for Obamacare?"

McCarthy: "No, I am not."

Broun: "Why not?"

McCarthy: "Well, because I'm lucky enough as a federal government [employee] that I have health care available to me which I've signed up for. In a few years, when that's not the case, I'll be happy to have other available health care opportunities..."

Broun: "Well, the president says health care opportunities is much better than forcing most federal employees into Obamacare and obviously if you are not signing up you don't think it is. Mr. Chairman, I've run out of time; I yield back."

The off-topic discussion didn't end there, as Texas Representative Steve Stockman then engaged in this back-and-forth with McCarthy:

Stockman: "I think, though, earlier you gave me my favorite tweet of the day which I'm going to send out, which is ... 'I'm lucky enough not to have to sign up for Obamacare.' That's wonderful. I wish my constituents could say the same."

McCarthy: "I actually think I was referring to, I'm lucky enough to have access to good health care which the Affordable Care Act will expand..."

Stockman: "I still will take your quote for the record. I wrote it down. It's really good."

Stockman kept his word with this tweet: "We asked EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy if she signed up for Obamacare. Her response: 'I'm lucky enough not to have to.'"

Here's McCarthy's actual quote: "Well, because I'm lucky enough as a federal government [employee] that I have health care available to me which I've signed up for. In a few years, when that's not the case, I'll be happy to have other available health care opportunities..."

Here's Stockman's version of the quote: "'I'm lucky enough not to have to sign up for Obamacare.'"

Based on that deranged interpretation, I believe when given the following quotes, Mr. Stockman would misquote them like this:

Actual quote: "I believe we need to provide comprehensive sexual education for our kids and make certain contraception is readily available, so we're left with fewer unwanted pregnancies, and with that, fewer abortions."

Stockman's interpretation: "Okay, so, I have you down for saying, 'I like killing babies.' Just as I suspected..."


Actual quote: "I believe love is what marriage should ultimately be based upon and not gender, therefore I believe homosexuals should be afforded the right to marry one another."

Stockman's interpretation: "Let me see if I have this quote written down properly. What you said is, 'I'm an atheist,' is that correct?"


Actual quote: "I believe corporations have far too much influence over elections as it is and I believe it's the people in this country whom should ultimately determine the outcomes of elections and not corporations. Corporations aren't people and I firmly believe we should overturn the Citizens United ruling, so we can help to minimize corporations' influence and give more power to the actual people whom vote."

Stockman's interpretation: "What does everyone else have her down as saying? I have her just saying, 'I'm a Communist, Socialist, Marxist, and lesbian.' Is everyone in agreement? Okay, let's grab a bite to eat at Hooters."

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/11/14/2943631/gop-congressman-interrupts-climate-hearing-obamacare-question/

https://twitter.com/SteveWorks4You/status/401038408073494528

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"