Skip to main content

So, I went to Cracker Barrel the other day...

I recently went to the restaurant Cracker Barrel. I don't go there very often, but once in a while, I crave old-fashioned Southern cuisine. Since there was a fairly long wait, I had to place my name on a waiting list. The woman writing the name spelled Craig as "Krieg," and then pronounced it "Kreeeeeg." I found this amusing enough to post a status about it on Facebook. Upon doing so, however, an old friend of mine informed me that Cracker Barrel is an anti-LGBT establishment. He then later informed me that he had been misinformed, that the anti-LGBT owner of the restaurant(s) had passed away a year or so ago, but that he'd have a hard time believing the place has changed its stance much on the issue.

I am all about equality for the LGBT community. I can completely understand members of the LGBT community boycotting a particular business due to their outspokenness against their attaining equal rights, like Chick fil-A or the Salvation Army has done in the past. However, I have a difficult time boycotting businesses (like Cracker Barrel, for instance), whom aren't outspoken one way or the other. The fact of the matter is, it would be next to impossible for any one business to be fully aligned with me on my beliefs. This would only happen if I happened to be the owner of that particular business.

All I ask from companies I do business with is that they treat me and everyone with a quality product and quality service. They may not agree with me on a number of issues, but so long as they don't go pubic with them, I don't see much point in boycotting. If I treated every business in that kind of manner, I'd be left trapped in my homestead without any place to go.

While I can completely understand people straying away from Chick fil-A, the Salvation Army, and Hobby Lobby, among other such places, I think it's of greater importance to educate people on homosexuality, continue to increase public support for equal marriage rights, elect politicians into office whom are following this growing trend of support, and make our voices heard loud and clear to elected officials on the matter through phone calls, emails, and protests. Through these means, we will one day see equal marriage rights nationwide.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"